Few-Shot Design Optimization by Exploiting Auxiliary Information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many real-world design problems involve optimizing an expensive black-box function f(x), such as hardware design or drug discovery. Bayesian Optimization has emerged as a sample-efficient framework for this problem. However, the basic setting considered by these methods is simplified compared to real-world experimental setups, where experiments often generate a wealth of useful information. We introduce a new setting where an experiment generates high-dimensional auxiliary information h(x) along with the performance measure f(x); moreover, a history of previously solved tasks from the same task family is available for accelerating optimization. A key challenge of our setting is learning how to represent and utilize h(x) for efficiently solving new optimization tasks beyond the task history. We develop a novel approach for this setting based on a neural model which predicts f(x) for unseen designs given a few-shot context containing observations of h(x). We evaluate our method on two challenging domains, robotic hardware design and neural network hyperparameter tuning, and introduce a novel design problem and large-scale benchmark for the former. On both domains, our method utilizes auxiliary feedback effectively to achieve more accurate few-shot prediction and faster optimization of design tasks, significantly outperforming several methods for multi-task optimization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.
Builds on
27 of 37 references.
References · 27
- 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
- 2016Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of moleculescited by 762
- 2018GPyTorch: Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Accelerationcited by 603
- 2015Deep Kernel Learningcited by 440
- 2018Conditional Neural Processescited by 421
- 2021Transformers Can Do Bayesian Inferencecited by 338
- 2018Neural Processescited by 307
- 2015Scalable Bayesian Optimization Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 284
- 2021Bayesian Optimization is Superior to Random Search for Machine Learning Hyperparameter Tuning: Analysis of the Black-Box Optimization Challenge 2020cited by 146
- 2022Transformer Neural Processes: Uncertainty-Aware Meta Learning Via Sequence Modelingcited by 126
- 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPOcited by 111
- 2022Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising Autoencoderscited by 99
15 more
- 2022Towards Learning Universal Hyperparameter Optimizers with Transformerscited by 81
- 2021HPO-B: A Large-Scale Reproducible Benchmark for Black-Box HPO based on OpenMLcited by 75
- 2019Meta-Learning Acquisition Functions for Transfer Learning in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 70
- 2021Few-Shot Bayesian Optimization with Deep Kernel Surrogatescited by 70
- 2021Pre-trained Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 63
- 2022Approximate Convex Decomposition for 3D Meshes with Collision-Aware Concavity and Tree Searchcited by 61
- 2023A Study of Bayesian Neural Network Surrogates for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 50
- 2019Bayesian Optimization of Composite Functionscited by 45
- 2023Efficient Bayesian Learning Curve Extrapolation using Prior-Data Fitted Networkscited by 37
- 2021Bayesian Optimization of Function Networkscited by 33
- 2023End-to-End Meta-Bayesian Optimisation with Transformer Neural Processescited by 31
- 2019Data-efficient Learning of Morphology and Controller for a Microrobotcited by 26
- 2020Fit2Form: 3D Generative Model for Robot Gripper Form Designcited by 21
- 2024Dynamics-Guided Diffusion Model for Sensor-less Robot Manipulator Designcited by 7
- 2023Joint Composite Latent Space Bayesian Optimizationcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.