Differentiable Modal Logic for Multi-Agent Diagnosis, Orchestration and Communication
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
As multi-agent AI systems evolve from simple chatbots to autonomous swarms, debugging semantic failures requires reasoning about knowledge, belief, causality, and obligation, precisely what modal logic was designed to formalize. However, traditional modal logic requires manual specification of relationship structures that are unknown or dynamic in real systems. This tutorial demonstrates differentiable modal logic (DML), implemented via Modal Logical Neural Networks (MLNNs), enabling systems to learn trust networks, causal chains, and regulatory boundaries from behavioral data alone. We present a unified neurosymbolic debugging framework through four modalities: epistemic (who to trust), temporal (when events cause failures), deontic (what actions are permitted), and doxastic (how to interpret agent confidence). Each modality is demonstrated on concrete multi-agent scenarios, from discovering deceptive alliances in diplomacy games to detecting LLM hallucinations, with complete implementations showing how logical contradictions become learnable optimization objectives. Key contributions for the neurosymbolic community: (1) interpretable learned structures where trust and causality are explicit parameters, not opaque embeddings; (2) knowledge injection via differentiable axioms that guide learning with sparse data (3) compositional multi-modal reasoning that combines epistemic, temporal, and deontic constraints; and (4) practical deployment patterns for monitoring, active control and communication of multi-agent systems. All code provided as executable Jupyter notebooks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.
Builds on
11 of 19 references.
References · 11
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 389
- 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 197
- 2020Logical Neural Networkscited by 118
- 2023Scallop: A Language for Neurosymbolic Programmingcited by 63
- 2025LLM-based Agents Suffer from Hallucinations: A Survey of Taxonomy, Methods, and Directionscited by 49
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI in 2024: A Systematic Reviewcited by 36
- 2025Modal Logic Neural Networkscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Agentic System with Modal Logic for Autonomous Diagnostics
- 2026FormalJudge: A Neuro-Symbolic Paradigm for Agentic Oversight
- 2026Epistemic-Probabilistic Model for Guarded Multi-Agent LLM Coordination
- 2024A Neuro-Symbolic Approach to Multi-Agent RL for Interpretability and Probabilistic Decision Making
- 2026Differentiable Logic Programming to Mitigate Reasoning Shortcuts in Neurosymbolic Systems
- 2025Nature's Insight: A Novel Framework and Comprehensive Analysis of Agentic Reasoning Through the Lens of Neuroscience
- 2025Do LLMs Dream of Discrete Algorithms?
- 2026The RAIL Principles for Neurosymbolic AI: Reasoning, Assurances, Interfacing and Learning