mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agentic System with Modal Logic for Autonomous Diagnostics

arXiv 2509.11943 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2025cs.AI cs.LG cs.LOcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

The development of intelligent agents, particularly those powered by language models (LMs), has shown a critical role in various environments that require intelligent and autonomous decision-making. Environments are not passive testing grounds, and they represent the data required for agents to learn and exhibit in very challenging conditions that require adaptive, complex, and autonomous capacity to make decisions. While the paradigm of scaling models and datasets has led to remarkable emergent capabilities, we argue that scaling the structure, fidelity, and logical consistency of agent reasoning within these environments is a crucial, yet underexplored, dimension of AI research. This paper introduces a neuro-symbolic multi-agent architecture where the belief states of individual agents are formally represented as Kripke models. This foundational choice enables them to reason about known concepts of possibility and necessity using the formal language of modal logic. In this work, we use immutable, domain-specific knowledge to make an informed root cause diagnosis, which is encoded as logical constraints essential for proper, reliable, and explainable diagnosis. In the proposed model, we show constraints that actively guide the hypothesis generation of LMs, effectively preventing them from reaching physically or logically untenable conclusions. In a high-fidelity simulated particle accelerator environment, our system successfully diagnoses complex, cascading failures by combining the powerful semantic intuition of LMs with the rigorous, verifiable validation of modal logic and a factual world model and showcasing a viable path toward more robust, reliable, and verifiable autonomous agents.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2025.

Builds on

6 of 8 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges15 May

Other references · 5

  1. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,512
  2. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  3. 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
  4. 2020Discovering contemporaneous and lagged causal relations in autocorrelated nonlinear time series datasetscited by 137
  5. 2024Towards Agentic AI on Particle Acceleratorscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Differentiable Modal Logic for Multi-Agent Diagnosis, Orchestration and Communication
  2. 2026Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI): Architectures, Taxonomies, and Evaluation of Large Language Model Agents
  3. 2026The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities
  4. 2025Nature's Insight: A Novel Framework and Comprehensive Analysis of Agentic Reasoning Through the Lens of Neuroscience
  5. 2026A Survey of Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models: Towards Recursively Self-Improving and Collective Agents
  6. 2024Mental Modeling of Reinforcement Learning Agents by Language Models
  7. 2025Agentic AI Needs a Systems Theory
  8. 2026Interpreting Agentic Systems: Beyond Model Explanations to System-Level Accountability