mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When would Vision-Proprioception Policies Fail in Robotic Manipulation?

arXiv 2602.12032 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2026cs.ROcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Proprioceptive information is critical for precise servo control by providing real-time robotic states. Its collaboration with vision is highly expected to enhance performances of the manipulation policy in complex tasks. However, recent studies have reported inconsistent observations on the generalization of vision-proprioception policies. In this work, we investigate this by conducting temporally controlled experiments. We found that during task sub-phases that robot's motion transitions, which require target localization, the vision modality of the vision-proprioception policy plays a limited role. Further analysis reveals that the policy naturally gravitates toward concise proprioceptive signals that offer faster loss reduction when training, thereby dominating the optimization and suppressing the learning of the visual modality during motion-transition phases. To alleviate this, we propose the Gradient Adjustment with Phase-guidance (GAP) algorithm that adaptively modulates the optimization of proprioception, enabling dynamic collaboration within the vision-proprioception policy. Specifically, we leverage proprioception to capture robotic states and estimate the probability of each timestep in the trajectory belonging to motion-transition phases. During policy learning, we apply fine-grained adjustment that reduces the magnitude of proprioception's gradient based on estimated probabilities, leading to robust and generalizable vision-proprioception policies. The comprehensive experiments demonstrate GAP is applicable in both simulated and real-world environments, across one-arm and dual-arm setups, and compatible with both conventional and Vision-Language-Action models. We believe this work can offer valuable insights into the development of vision-proprioception policies in robotic manipulation.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Adapt Your Body: Mitigating Proprioception Shifts in Imitation Learning
  2. 2026Multisensory Continual Learning: Adapting Pretrained Visuomotor Policies to Force ↗
  3. 2024Optimizing Active Perception for Learning Simultaneous Viewpoint Selection and Manipulation with Diffusion Policy
  4. 2026ProTracer: Proprioception-Guided Failure Diagnosis in Robot Manipulation
  5. 2025VGGT-DP: Generalizable Robot Control via Vision Foundation Models
  6. 2025Vision-Proprioception Fusion with Mamba2 in End-to-End Reinforcement Learning for Motion Control
  7. 2026Move-Then-Operate: Behavioral Phasing for Human-Like Robotic Manipulation
  8. 2021Seeing All the Angles: Learning Multiview Manipulation Policies for Contact-Rich Tasks from Demonstrations