CAAL: Confidence-Aware Active Learning for Heteroscedastic Atmospheric Regression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantifying the impacts of air pollution on health and climate relies on key atmospheric particle properties such as toxicity and hygroscopicity. However, these properties typically require complex observational techniques or expensive particle-resolved numerical simulations, limiting the availability of labeled data. We therefore estimate these hard-to-measure particle properties from routinely available observations (e.g., air pollutant concentrations and meteorological conditions). Because routine observations only indirectly reflect particle composition and structure, the mapping from routine observations to particle properties is noisy and input-dependent, yielding a heteroscedastic regression setting. With a limited and costly labeling budget, the central challenge is to select which samples to measure or simulate. While active learning is a natural approach, most acquisition strategies rely on predictive uncertainty. Under heteroscedastic noise, this signal conflates reducible epistemic uncertainty with irreducible aleatoric uncertainty, causing limited budgets to be wasted in noise-dominated regions. To address this challenge, we propose a confidence-aware active learning framework (CAAL) for efficient and robust sample selection in heteroscedastic settings. CAAL consists of two components: a decoupled uncertainty-aware training objective that separately optimises the predictive mean and noise level to stabilise uncertainty estimation, and a confidence-aware acquisition function that dynamically weights epistemic uncertainty using predicted aleatoric uncertainty as a reliability signal. Experiments on particle-resolved numerical simulations and real atmospheric observations show that CAAL consistently outperforms standard AL baselines. The proposed framework provides a practical and general solution for the efficient expansion of high-cost atmospheric particle property databases.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.
Builds on
10 of 73 references.
References · 10
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
- 2021Gone Fishing: Neural Active Learning with Fisher Embeddingscited by 88
- 2019Bayesian Batch Active Learning as Sparse Subset Approximationcited by 68
- 2019Reliable training and estimation of variance networkscited by 63
- 2022A Framework and Benchmark for Deep Batch Active Learning for Regressioncited by 49
- 2022Bayesian Active Learning with Fully Bayesian Gaussian Processescited by 26
- 2021Test Distribution-Aware Active Learning: A Principled Approach Against Distribution Shift and Outlierscited by 22
- 2021Sample Noise Impact on Active Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.