SkillRater: Untangling Capabilities in Multimodal Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data curation methods typically assign samples a single quality score. We argue this scalar framing is fundamentally limited: when training requires multiple distinct capabilities, a monolithic scorer cannot maximize useful signals for all of them simultaneously. Quality is better understood as multidimensional, with each dimension corresponding to a capability the model must acquire. We introduce SkillRater, a framework that decomposes data filtering into specialized raters - one per capability, each trained via meta-learning on a disjoint validation objective - and composes their scores through a progressive selection rule: at each training stage, a sample is retained if any rater ranks it above a threshold that tightens over time, preserving diversity early while concentrating on high-value samples late. We validate this approach on vision language models, decomposing quality into three capability dimensions: visual understanding, OCR, and STEM reasoning. At 2B parameters, SkillRater improves over unfiltered baselines by 5.63% on visual understanding, 2.00% on OCR, and 3.53% on STEM on held out benchmarks. The learned rater signals are near orthogonal, confirming that the decomposition captures genuinely independent quality dimensions and explaining why it outperforms both unfiltered training and monolithic learned filtering.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2026.
Builds on
35 of 42 references.
References · 35
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,582
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,449
- 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
- 2023SEED-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs with Generative Comprehensioncited by 929
- 2016A Diagram Is Worth A Dozen Imagescited by 793
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
- 2022A-OKVQA: A Benchmark for Visual Question Answering using World Knowledgecited by 702
23 more
- 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2024BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceivecited by 529
- 2024Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Datasetcited by 516
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
- 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 494
- 2018A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographscited by 457
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 385
- 2015Gradient-based Hyperparameter Optimization through Reversible Learningcited by 357
- 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 322
- 2019Optimizing Millions of Hyperparameters by Implicit Differentiationcited by 303
- 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
- 2022Visual Spatial Reasoningcited by 288
- 2024MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scalecited by 125
- 2023M3Exam: A Multilingual, Multimodal, Multilevel Benchmark for Examining Large Language Modelscited by 109
- 2023Skill-Mix: a Flexible and Expandable Family of Evaluations for AI modelscited by 64
- 2025Nemotron-CLIMB: CLustering-based Iterative Data Mixture Bootstrapping for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 62
- 2019Optimizing Data Usage via Differentiable Rewardscited by 48
- 2025Not All Tokens Are What You Need In Thinkingcited by 20
- 2025Language Models Improve When Pretraining Data Matches Target Taskscited by 18
- 2024Mixture-of-Skills: Learning to Optimize Data Usage for Fine-Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2025Scalable Meta-Learning via Mixed-Mode Differentiationcited by 4
- 2025AutoMixer: Checkpoint Artifacts as Automatic Data Mixerscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Uncovering Intrinsic Capabilities: A Paradigm for Data Curation in Vision-Language Models
- 2025Investigating Redundancy in Multimodal Large Language Models with Multiple Vision Encoders
- 2026DataComp-VLM: Improved Open Datasets for Vision-Language Models
- 2025Demystifying the Visual Quality Paradox in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2026Data-Efficient Curation for Multimodal Reasoning under Fixed Training Protocols
- 202620/20 Vision Language Models: A Prescription for Better VLMs through Data Curation Alone
- 2025VITAL: Vision-Encoder-centered Pre-training for LMMs in Visual Quality Assessment
- 2025VERITAS: Leveraging Vision Priors and Expert Fusion to Improve Multimodal Data