mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Sampling and Clipping for Private Worst-Case Group Optimization

arXiv 2602.10820 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A central requirement for the acceptance of machine learning methods for human-centric tasks is that they should be fair, in the sense that they should work comparably well for individuals from different societal groups. A second, equally important, requirement is that they should respect the privacy of user data. While techniques exist to address each aspect in isolation, such as worst-case group optimization for the former and differentially private SGD for the latter, these are often at odds with with each other, and no practical method currently exists to enforce both requirements simultaneously. In this work, we overcome this problem and propose an algorithm for optimizing the worst-case group accuracy in a differentially private way. Our main contribution is ASC (Adaptively Sampled and Clipped Worst-case Group Optimization), which adaptively controls both the sampling rate and the clipping threshold of each group's gradient contributions. Thereby, it is able to reweight the training objective in favor of harder-to-learn groups, while keeping the noise required to enforce privacy low enough to preserve model utility. Our experiments show that ASC achieves substantially higher worst-case group accuracy than prior work, without sacrificing overall average accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.

Builds on

24 of 38 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  4. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  5. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
  6. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  7. 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
  8. 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
  9. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 481
  10. 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 335
  11. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  12. 2018Subsampled R'enyi Differential Privacy and Analytical Moments Accountantcited by 236
12 more
  1. 2020Large-Scale Methods for Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 179
  2. 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 153
  3. 2023Revisiting Gradient Clipping: Stochastic bias and tight convergence guaranteescited by 83
  4. 2014Differential Privacy and Machine Learning: a Survey and Reviewcited by 67
  5. 2020Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approachcited by 53
  6. 2022Turning the Tables: Biased, Imbalanced, Dynamic Tabular Datasets for ML Evaluationcited by 40
  7. 2022Disparate Impact in Differential Privacy from Gradient Misalignmentcited by 31
  8. 2025Privacy amplification by random allocationcited by 15
  9. 2023Recent Advances of Differential Privacy in Centralized Deep Learning: A Systematic Surveycited by 12
  10. 2024Subsampling is not Magic: Why Large Batch Sizes Work for Differentially Private Stochastic Optimisationcited by 11
  11. 2024Differentially Private Worst-group Risk Minimizationcited by 9
  12. 2020Communication-efficient Decentralized Local SGD over Undirected Networkscited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.