mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Geometry-Aware Decoding with Wasserstein-Regularized Truncation and Mass Penalties for Large Language Models

arXiv 2602.10346 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) must balance diversity and creativity against logical coherence in open-ended generation. Existing truncation-based samplers are effective but largely heuristic, relying mainly on probability mass and entropy while ignoring semantic geometry of the token space. We present Top-W, a geometry-aware truncation rule that uses Wasserstein distance-defined over token-embedding geometry-to keep the cropped distribution close to the original, while explicitly balancing retained probability mass against the entropy of the kept set. Our theory yields a simple closed-form structure for the fixed-potential subset update: depending on the mass-entropy trade-off, the optimal crop either collapses to a single token or takes the form of a one-dimensional prefix that can be found efficiently with a linear scan. We implement Top-W using efficient geometry-based potentials (nearest-set or k-NN) and pair it with an alternating decoding routine that keeps the standard truncation-and-sampling interface unchanged. Extensive experiments on four benchmarks (GSM8K, GPQA, AlpacaEval, and MT-Bench) across three instruction-tuned models show that Top-W consistently outperforms prior state-of-the-art decoding approaches achieving up to 33.7% improvement. Moreover, we find that Top-W not only improves accuracy-focused performance, but also boosts creativity under judge-based open-ended evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

30 of 40 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  6. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  7. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  9. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  10. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  11. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  12. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
18 more
  1. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  2. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
  3. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,653
  4. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
  5. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
  6. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  7. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  8. 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 609
  9. 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 378
  10. 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 376
  11. 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 301
  12. 2022A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text Generationcited by 225
  13. 2024Turning Up the Heat: Min-p Sampling for Creative and Coherent LLM Outputscited by 150
  14. 2022Truncation Sampling as Language Model Desmoothingcited by 123
  15. 2022Locally Typical Samplingcited by 111
  16. 2022Contrastive Search Is What You Need For Neural Text Generationcited by 59
  17. 2025Top-H Decoding: Adapting the Creativity and Coherence with Bounded Entropy in Text Generationcited by 9
  18. 2020Mirostat: A Neural Text Decoding Algorithm that Directly Controls Perplexitycited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.