mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AnalyticsGPT: An LLM Workflow for Scientometric Question Answering

arXiv 2602.09817 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.CL cs.DLcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Agentic RAG, agents and memory

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces AnalyticsGPT, an intuitive and efficient large language model (LLM)-powered workflow for scientometric question answering. This underrepresented downstream task addresses the subcategory of meta-scientific questions concerning the "science of science." When compared to traditional scientific question answering based on papers, the task poses unique challenges in the planning phase. Namely, the need for named-entity recognition of academic entities within questions and multi-faceted data retrieval involving scientometric indices, e.g. impact factors. Beyond their exceptional capacity for treating traditional natural language processing tasks, LLMs have shown great potential in more complex applications, such as task decomposition and planning and reasoning. In this paper, we explore the application of LLMs to scientometric question answering, and describe an end-to-end system implementing a sequential workflow with retrieval-augmented generation and agentic concepts. We also address the secondary task of effectively synthesizing the data into presentable and well-structured high-level analyses. As a database for retrieval-augmented generation, we leverage a proprietary research performance assessment platform. For evaluation, we consult experienced subject matter experts and leverage LLMs-as-judges. In doing so, we provide valuable insights on the efficacy of LLMs towards a niche downstream task. Our (skeleton) code and prompts are available at: https://github.com/lyvykhang/llm-agents-scientometric-qa/tree/acl.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agentic RAG, agents and memory, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 10 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

10 of 19 references.

References · 10

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  3. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  4. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  5. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
  6. 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A surveycited by 414
  7. 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 372
  8. 2024Replacing Judges with Juries: Evaluating LLM Generations with a Panel of Diverse Modelscited by 301
  9. 2023DBLP-QuAD: A Question Answering Dataset over the DBLP Scholarly Knowledge Graphcited by 18
  10. 2024On the Implications of Verbose LLM Outputs: A Case Study in Translation Evaluationcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ResearchGPT: Benchmarking and Training LLMs for End-to-End Computer Science Research Workflows
  2. 2025The Empowerment of Science of Science by Large Language Models: New Tools and Methods
  3. 2026LitTraceQA: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Grounding and Verification in Scientific Question Answering
  4. 2025ScIRGen: Synthesize Realistic and Large-Scale RAG Dataset for Scientific Research
  5. 2026DeepEra: A Deep Evidence Reranking Agent for Scientific Retrieval-Augmented Generated Question Answering
  6. 2025SciGPT: A Large Language Model for Scientific Literature Understanding and Knowledge Discovery
  7. 2026CE-GOCD: Central Entity-Guided Graph Optimization for Community Detection to Augment LLM Scientific Question Answering
  8. 2025HiPerRAG: High-Performance Retrieval Augmented Generation for Scientific Insights