mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Linear Model Extraction via Factual and Counterfactual Queries

arXiv 2602.09748 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026math.OC cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In model extraction attacks, the goal is to reveal the parameters of a black-box machine learning model by querying the model for a selected set of data points. Due to an increasing demand for explanations, this may involve counterfactual queries besides the typically considered factual queries. In this work, we consider linear models and three types of queries: factual, counterfactual, and robust counterfactual. First, for an arbitrary set of queries, we derive novel mathematical formulations for the classification regions for which the decision of the unknown model is known, without recovering any of the model parameters. Second, we derive bounds on the number of queries needed to extract the model's parameters for (robust) counterfactual queries under arbitrary norm-based distances. We show that the full model can be recovered using just a single counterfactual query when differentiable distance measures are employed. In contrast, when using polyhedral distances for instance, the number of required queries grows linearly with the dimension of the data space. For robust counterfactuals, the latter number of queries doubles. Consequently, the applied distance function and robustness of counterfactuals have a significant impact on the model's security.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

15 of 27 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  2. 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
  3. 2020A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learningcited by 143
  4. 2021When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Privatecited by 126
  5. 2018Model Reconstruction from Model Explanationscited by 84
  6. 2018Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model Extractioncited by 84
  7. 2020Model extraction from counterfactual explanationscited by 46
  8. 2022DualCF: Efficient Model Extraction Attack from Counterfactual Explanationscited by 31
  9. 2022The privacy issue of counterfactual explanations: explanation linkage attackscited by 20
  10. 2023Finding Regions of Counterfactual Explanations via Robust Optimizationcited by 19
  11. 2024Model Reconstruction Using Counterfactual Explanations: A Perspective From Polytope Theorycited by 12
  12. 2024Trained Random Forests Completely Reveal your Datasetcited by 11
3 more
  1. 2023AUTOLYCUS: Exploiting Explainable AI (XAI) for Model Extraction Attacks against Interpretable Modelscited by 9
  2. 2024A Survey of Privacy-Preserving Model Explanations: Privacy Risks, Attacks, and Countermeasurescited by 6
  3. 2025From Counterfactuals to Trees: Competitive Analysis of Model Extraction Attackscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.