Towards Understanding Multimodal Fine-Tuning: Spatial Features
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
Contemporary Vision-Language Models (VLMs) achieve strong performance on a wide range of tasks by pairing a vision encoder with a pre-trained language model, fine-tuned for visual-text inputs. Yet despite these gains, it remains unclear how language backbone representations adapt during multimodal training and when vision-specific capabilities emerge. In this work, we present the first mechanistic analysis of VLM adaptation. Using stage-wise model diffing, a technique that isolates representational changes introduced during multimodal fine-tuning, we reveal how a language model learns to "see". We first identify vision-preferring features that emerge or reorient during fine-tuning. We then show that a selective subset of these features reliably encodes spatial relations, revealed through controlled shifts to spatial prompts. Finally, we trace the causal activation of these features to a small group of attention heads. Our findings show that stage-wise model diffing reveals when and where spatially grounded multimodal features arise. It also provides a clearer view of modality fusion by showing how visual grounding reshapes features that were previously text-only. This methodology enhances the interpretability of multimodal training and provides a foundation for understanding and refining how pretrained language models acquire vision-grounded capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 34 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.
Builds on
34 of 47 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025How Visual Representations Map to Language Feature Space in Multimodal LLMs13 Jun
- 2025LLaVA-MORE: A Comparative Study of LLMs and Visual Backbones for Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning19 Mar
- 2025Analyzing Finetuning Representation Shift for Multimodal LLMs Steering6 Jan
- 2024Progressive Multimodal Reasoning via Active Retrieval19 Dec
- 2024LLaVA-NeXT-Interleave: Tackling Multi-image, Video, and 3D in Large Multimodal Models10 Jul
- 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs11 Jan
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning5 Oct
Other references · 27
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 478
- 2024LLaVA-CoT: Let Vision Language Models Reason Step-by-Stepcited by 446
- 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 328
- 2022Visual Spatial Reasoningcited by 288
- 2014Understanding image representations by measuring their equivariance and equivalencecited by 240
15 more
- 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 215
- 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 203
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 189
- 2024Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought Reasoningcited by 135
- 2024Llama Scope: Extracting Millions of Features from Llama-3.1-8B with Sparse Autoencoderscited by 133
- 2024Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language Modelscited by 115
- 2024Insight-V: Exploring Long-Chain Visual Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 112
- 2025Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probingcited by 109
- 2024Interpreting and Editing Vision-Language Representations to Mitigate Hallucinationscited by 103
- 2021Representation Topology Divergence: A Method for Comparing Neural Network Representationscited by 66
- 2023Towards Vision-Language Mechanistic Interpretability: A Causal Tracing Tool for BLIPcited by 62
- 2023Multimodal Neurons in Pretrained Text-Only Transformerscited by 49
- 2024Understanding Information Storage and Transfer in Multi-modal Large Language Modelscited by 48
- 2024LVLM-Interpret: An Interpretability Tool for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 23
- 2023Interpreting and Controlling Vision Foundation Models via Text Explanationscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Perceiving Beyond Language Priors: Enhancing Visual Comprehension and Attention in Multimodal Models
- 2026Architecture-Dependent Fusion Pathways in MLLMs
- 2026Temporal Gains, Spatial Costs: Revisiting Video Fine-Tuning in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Efficiently Integrate Large Language Models with Visual Perception: A Survey from the Training Paradigm Perspective
- 2026Beyond Language Modeling: An Exploration of Multimodal Pretraining
- 2026Visual Instruction Tuning Aligns Modalities through Abstraction
- 2026From Structure to Synergy: A Survey of Vision-Language Perception Paradigm Evolution in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2026Where Does Vision Meet Language? Understanding and Refining Visual Fusion in MLLMs via Contrastive Attention