mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Trading-Off Static and Dynamic Regret in Online Least-Squares and Beyond

arXiv 1909.03118 ↗First posted 6 Sep 2019cs.LG stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recursive least-squares algorithms often use forgetting factors as a heuristic to adapt to non-stationary data streams. The first contribution of this paper rigorously characterizes the effect of forgetting factors for a class of online Newton algorithms. For exp-concave and strongly convex objectives, the algorithms achieve the dynamic regret of maxO(log T),O(√TV), where V is a bound on the path length of the comparison sequence. In particular, we show how classic recursive least-squares with a forgetting factor achieves this dynamic regret bound. By varying V, we obtain a trade-off between static and dynamic regret. In order to obtain more computationally efficient algorithms, our second contribution is a novel gradient descent step size rule for strongly convex functions. Our gradient descent rule recovers the order optimal dynamic regret bounds described above. For smooth problems, we can also obtain static regret of O(T1-β) and dynamic regret of O(Tβ V^*), where β ∈ (0,1) and V^* is the path length of the sequence of minimizers. By varying β, we obtain a trade-off between static and dynamic regret.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

12 papers.