mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural Networks With Dense Weights Are Not Universal Approximators

arXiv 2602.07618 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the approximation capabilities of dense neural networks. While universal approximation theorems establish that sufficiently large architectures can approximate arbitrary continuous functions if there are no restrictions on the weight values, we show that dense neural networks do not possess this universality. Our argument is based on a model compression approach, combining the weak regularity lemma with an interpretation of feedforward networks as message passing graph neural networks. We consider ReLU neural networks subject to natural constraints on weights and input and output dimensions, which model a notion of dense connectivity. Within this setting, we demonstrate the existence of Lipschitz continuous functions that cannot be approximated by such networks. This highlights intrinsic limitations of neural networks with dense layers and motivates the use of sparse connectivity as a necessary ingredient for achieving true universality.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.

Builds on

27 of 43 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  3. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  4. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  5. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  6. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
  7. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,548
  8. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
  9. 2016Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networkscited by 567
  10. 2021Sparsity in Deep Learning: Pruning and growth for efficient inference and training in neural networkscited by 521
  11. 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 491
  12. 2017Scalable Training of Artificial Neural Networks with Adaptive Sparse Connectivity inspired by Network Sciencecited by 325
15 more
  1. 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 306
  2. 2018Sorting out Lipschitz function approximationcited by 211
  3. 2020The Computational Limits of Deep Learningcited by 188
  4. 2021Efficient Deep Learning: A Survey on Making Deep Learning Models Smaller, Faster, and Bettercited by 153
  5. 2023Edge Directionality Improves Learning on Heterophilic Graphscited by 88
  6. 2022Pruning's Effect on Generalization Through the Lens of Training and Regularizationcited by 31
  7. 2023A graphon-signal analysis of graph neural networkscited by 29
  8. 2020Approximating Lipschitz continuous functions with GroupSort neural networkscited by 27
  9. 2022Sparse Double Descent: Where Network Pruning Aggravates Overfittingcited by 26
  10. 2023Fine-grained Expressivity of Graph Neural Networkscited by 25
  11. 2024Generalization, Expressivity, and Universality of Graph Neural Networks on Attributed Graphscited by 13
  12. 2024Learning on Large Graphs using Intersecting Communitiescited by 8
  13. 2025Higher-Order Graphon Neural Networks: Approximation and Cut Distancecited by 5
  14. 2025Efficient Learning on Large Graphs using a Densifying Regularity Lemmacited by 2
  15. 2025A Note on Graphon-Signal Analysis of Graph Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.