Active Learning Using Aggregated Acquisition Functions: Accuracy and Sustainability Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Active learning (AL) is a machine learning (ML) approach that strategically selects the most informative samples for annotation during training, aiming to minimize annotation costs. This strategy not only reduces labeling expenses but also results in energy savings during neural network training, thereby enhancing both data and energy efficiency. In this paper, we implement and evaluate various state-of-the-art acquisition functions, analyzing their accuracy and computational costs, while discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Our findings reveal that representativity-based acquisition functions effectively explore the dataset but do not prioritize boundary decisions, whereas uncertainty-based acquisition functions focus on refining boundary decisions already identified by the neural network. This trade-off is known as the exploration-exploitation dilemma. To address this dilemma, we introduce six aggregation structures: series, parallel, hybrid, adaptive feedback, random exploration, and annealing exploration. Our aggregated acquisition functions alleviate common AL pathologies such as batch mode inefficiency and the cold start problem. Additionally, we focus on balancing accuracy and energy consumption, contributing to the development of more sustainable, energy-aware artificial intelligence (AI). We evaluate our proposed structures on various models and datasets. Our results demonstrate the potential of these structures to reduce computational costs while maintaining or even improving accuracy. Innovative aggregation approaches, such as alternating between acquisition functions such as BALD and BADGE, have shown robust results. Sequentially running functions like K-Centers followed by BALD has achieved the same performance goals with up to 12% fewer samples, while reducing the acquisition cost by almost half.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2026.
Builds on
15 of 47 references.
References · 15
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
- 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
- 2019Green AIcited by 620
- 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 602
- 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
- 2020Deep Learning for ECG Analysis: Benchmarks and Insights from PTB-XLcited by 158
- 2021Gone Fishing: Neural Active Learning with Fisher Embeddingscited by 88
- 2021A Survey on Green Deep Learningcited by 52
- 2021Stochastic Batch Acquisition: A Simple Baseline for Deep Active Learningcited by 36
- 2018modAL: A modular active learning framework for Pythoncited by 35
3 more
- 2022Unifying Approaches in Active Learning and Active Sampling via Fisher Information and Information-Theoretic Quantitiescited by 28
- 2022Submodlib: A Submodular Optimization Librarycited by 8
- 2023Dynamic Exploration-Exploitation Trade-Off in Active Learning Regression with Bayesian Hierarchical Modelingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.