mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimized Piecewise Affine Abstractions of Neural Networks with Learnable Activation Functions

arXiv 2602.06737 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.LOcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a generalized framework for the range verification of neural networks featuring non-linear activation functions. Our approach first constructs an ``optimized piecewise affine abstraction" of the network that replaces each non-linear activation function by a piecewise affine (PWA) function plus a bounded error. Such PWA functions are readily amenable to existing neural network verification techniques using specializations of linear arithmetic SMT solvers and mixed-integer optimization approaches. However, there are infinitely many ways to abstract each node, with a natural tradeoff between the number of pieces used, the global error bound, and the complexity of the resulting verification problem. We propose a dynamic programming (DP) algorithm to systematically compute the optimized PWA abstraction for general activation functions, guaranteeing tighter output bounds. The algorithm combines a local DP approximation at each node with a global error bound, yielding a variant of the knapsack problem for deciding how to allocate a fixed budget on the total number of pieces across units so as to minimize the worst-case error bound between the network and its approximation. Although the knapsack problem is itself NP-hard, we can use pseudo-polynomial DP algorithms as well as approximation schemes to solve it efficiently. Crucially, our approach is broadly applicable to diverse networks consisting of non-linear activations, including standard Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) and recently proposed architectures such as Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs). Over a series of KAN benchmarks spanning 20 to 22,000 parameters, our approach yields output bounds that are consistently of smaller width than uniform PWA allocation. The overall time taken is roughly comparable while the overhead for computing the optimized abstraction is subsumed by the time taken to compute output bounds.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.

Builds on

33 of 56 references.

References · 33

  1. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,009
  2. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  3. 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 649
  4. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 445
  5. 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation with Asynchronous Off-Policy Updatescited by 353
  6. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 328
  7. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
  8. 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 263
  9. 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 242
  10. 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 228
  11. 2019Algorithms for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 221
  12. 2021Activation Functions in Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmarkcited by 155
21 more
  1. 2024Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks are Radial Basis Function Networkscited by 128
  2. 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 127
  3. 2024Chebyshev Polynomial-Based Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: An Efficient Architecture for Nonlinear Function Approximationcited by 118
  4. 2018Verisig: verifying safety properties of hybrid systems with neural network controllerscited by 84
  5. 2024DeepOKAN: Deep Operator Network Based on Kolmogorov Arnold Networks for Mechanics Problemscited by 84
  6. 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Deep Learning Adversarial Robustness: A Surveycited by 72
  7. 2024TKAN: Temporal Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 71
  8. 2021Introduction to Neural Network Verificationcited by 63
  9. 2024Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearitiescited by 47
  10. 2021Neural Network Robustness as a Verification Property: A Principled Case Studycited by 35
  11. 2024rKAN: Rational Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 35
  12. 2024Finite basis Kolmogorov-Arnold networks: domain decomposition for data-driven and physics-informed problemscited by 35
  13. 2020Deep Neural Networks with Trainable Activations and Controlled Lipschitz Constantcited by 25
  14. 2024Reduced Effectiveness of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks on Functions with Noisecited by 17
  15. 2024KKANs: Kurkova-Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks and Their Learning Dynamicscited by 13
  16. 2024KAN versus MLP on Irregular or Noisy Functionscited by 7
  17. 2024The Dawn of KAN in Image-to-Image (I2I) Translation: Integrating Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks with GANs for Unpaired I2I Translationcited by 7
  18. 2024Gaussian Process Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 6
  19. 2024MonoKAN: Certified Monotonic Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkcited by 4
  20. 2020Learning Predictive Models for Ergonomic Control of Prosthetic Devicescited by 1
  21. 2023Safe Robot Learning in Assistive Devices through Neural Network Repaircited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.