TrailBlazer: History-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Black-Box LLM Jailbreaking
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become integral to many domains, making their safety a critical priority. Prior jailbreaking research has explored diverse approaches, including prompt optimization, automated red teaming, obfuscation, and reinforcement learning (RL) based methods. However, most existing techniques fail to effectively leverage vulnerabilities revealed in earlier interaction turns, resulting in inefficient and unstable attacks. Since jailbreaking involves sequential interactions in which each response influences future actions, reinforcement learning provides a natural framework for this problem. Motivated by this, we propose a history-aware RL-based jailbreak framework that analyzes and reweights vulnerability signals from prior steps to guide future decisions. We show that incorporating historical information alone improves jailbreak success rates. Building on this insight, we introduce an attention-based reweighting mechanism that highlights critical vulnerabilities within the interaction history, enabling more efficient exploration with fewer queries. Extensive experiments on AdvBench and HarmBench demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art jailbreak performance while significantly improving query efficiency. These results underscore the importance of historical vulnerability signals in reinforcement learning-driven jailbreak strategies and offer a principled pathway for advancing adversarial research on LLM safeguards.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 45 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2026.
Builds on
45 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 20
Same direction, newest first
- 2025xJailbreak: Representation Space Guided Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable LLM Jailbreaking28 Jan
- 2024LLMStinger: Jailbreaking LLMs using RL fine-tuned LLMs13 Nov
- 2024AutoDAN-Turbo: A Lifelong Agent for Strategy Self-Exploration to Jailbreak LLMs3 Oct
- 2024FlipAttack: Jailbreak LLMs via Flipping2 Oct
- 2024PathSeeker: Exploring LLM Security Vulnerabilities with a Reinforcement Learning-Based Jailbreak Approach21 Sep
- 2024RL-JACK: Reinforcement Learning-powered Black-box Jailbreaking Attack against LLMs13 Jun
- 2024When LLM Meets DRL: Advancing Jailbreaking Efficiency via DRL-guided Search13 Jun
- 2024Improved Techniques for Optimization-Based Jailbreaking on Large Language Models31 May
- 2024Efficient LLM Jailbreak via Adaptive Dense-to-sparse Constrained Optimization15 May
- 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attacks2 Apr
- 2024SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decoding14 Feb
- 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs12 Jan
8 more
- 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automatically4 Dec
- 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries12 Oct
- 2023Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-43 Oct
- 2023GPTFUZZER: Red Teaming Large Language Models with Auto-Generated Jailbreak Prompts19 Sep
- 2023Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Prompting6 Sep
- 2023Open Sesame! Universal Black Box Jailbreaking of Large Language Models4 Sep
- 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
Other references · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,785
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
13 more
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 702
- 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 608
- 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgementscited by 527
- 2023Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?cited by 305
- 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 290
- 2024Analyzing the Generalization and Reliability of Steering Vectorscited by 130
- 2021Fine-Tuning Large Neural Language Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 57
- 2024Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Surveycited by 56
- 2026Grading Scale Impact on LLM-as-a-Judge: Human-LLM Alignment Is Highest on 0-5 Grading Scalecited by 17
- 2024Recent advancements in LLM Red-Teaming: Techniques, Defenses, and Ethical Considerationscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.