Hear You in Silence: Designing for Active Listening in Human Interaction with Conversational Agents Using Context-Aware Pacing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In human conversation, empathic dialogue requires nuanced temporal cues indicating whether the conversational partner is paying attention. This type of "active listening" is overlooked in the design of Conversational Agents (CAs), which use the same pacing for one conversation. To model the temporal cues in human conversation, we need CAs that dynamically adjust response pacing according to user input. We qualitatively analyzed ten cases of active listening to distill five context-aware pacing strategies: Reflective Silence, Facilitative Silence, Empathic Silence, Holding Space, and Immediate Response. In a between-subjects study (N=50) with two conversational scenarios (relationship and career-support), the context-aware agent scored higher than static-pacing control on perceived human-likeness, smoothness, and interactivity, supporting deeper self-disclosure and higher engagement. In the career support scenario, the CA yielded higher perceived listening quality and affective trust. This work shows how insights from human conversation like context-aware pacing can empower the design of more empathic human-AI communication.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 150 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.
Builds on
18 of 150 references.
References · 18
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2018The Design and Implementation of XiaoIce, an Empathetic Social Chatbotcited by 172
- 2021To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-makingcited by 118
- 2018From Eliza to XiaoIce: Challenges and Opportunities with Social Chatbotscited by 85
- 2020FastEmit: Low-latency Streaming ASR with Sequence-level Emission Regularizationcited by 66
- 2023"It's a Fair Game", or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational Agentscited by 60
- 2020If I Hear You Correctly: Building and Evaluating Interview Chatbots with Active Listening Skillscited by 20
- 2018On Evaluating and Comparing Open Domain Dialog Systemscited by 16
- 2025Mitigating Response Delays in Free-Form Conversations with LLM-powered Intelligent Virtual Agentscited by 12
- 2022Alexa as an Active Listener: How Backchanneling Can Elicit Self-Disclosure and Promote User Experiencecited by 6
- 2021Prosody-TTS: An end-to-end speech synthesis system with prosody controlcited by 5
6 more
- 2020GraphTTS: graph-to-sequence modelling in neural text-to-speechcited by 4
- 2023HealthPrism: A Visual Analytics System for Exploring Children's Physical and Mental Health Profiles with Multimodal Datacited by 3
- 2025Exploring the Effects of Chatbot Anthropomorphism and Human Empathy on Human Prosocial Behavior Toward Chatbotscited by 3
- 2022Effects of Online Self-Disclosure on Social Feedback During the COVID-19 Pandemiccited by 2
- 2025"Ronaldo's a poser!": How the Use of Generative AI Shapes Debates in Online Forumscited by 2
- 2020The Effect of Silence Feature in Dimensional Speech Emotion Recognitioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Deco: Extending Cherished Physical Objects into AI Companion Agents through Dual Embodimentcited by 0
- 2026Does Listening Matter? Backchanneling and Nodding in AI Clonecited by 0
- 2026Can Vision-Language Models Analyze Human-Centered Video? Mapping Model Capabilities and Human-AI Collaborative Workflowscited by 0
- 2026Can Vision-Language Models Analyze Human-Centered Video? Mapping Model Capabilities and Human-AI Collaborative Workflows23 Sep 2026
- 2026Does Listening Matter? Backchanneling and Nodding in AI Clone20 Aug 2026
- 2026Deco: Extending Cherished Physical Objects into AI Companion Agents through Dual Embodiment5 May 2026