mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Chunky Post-Training: Data Driven Failures of Generalization

arXiv 2602.05910 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM post-training involves many diverse datasets, each targeting a specific behavior. But these datasets encode incidental patterns alongside intended ones: correlations between formatting and content, narrow phrasings across diverse problems, and implicit associations arising from the discrete data curation process. These patterns are often invisible to developers yet salient to models, producing behaviors that surprise their creators, such as rejecting true facts presented in a particular question format. We call this chunky post-training: the model learns spurious correlations as a result of distinct chunks of post-training data. We introduce SURF, a black-box pipeline which surfaces these unintended behaviors at run time, and TURF, a tool that traces these failures back to specific post-training data. Applying these tools to frontier models (Claude 4.5, GPT-5.1, Grok 4.1, Gemini 3) and open models (T"ulu 3), we show that chunky post-training produces miscalibrated behaviors, which often result from imbalanced or underspecified chunks of post-training data.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.

Builds on

22 of 26 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  5. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  6. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  7. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
  8. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  9. 2022Red Teaming Language Models to Reduce Harms: Methods, Scaling Behaviors, and Lessons Learnedcited by 729
  10. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 672
  11. 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
  12. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 472
10 more
  1. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 396
  2. 2024Rainbow Teaming: Open-Ended Generation of Diverse Adversarial Promptscited by 205
  3. 2025Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMscited by 172
  4. 2025Natural Emergent Misalignment from Reward Hacking in Production RLcited by 136
  5. 2021Identifying and Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Improving Robustness in NLP Modelscited by 76
  6. 2024Navigating Shortcuts, Spurious Correlations, and Confounders: From Origins via Detection to Mitigationcited by 25
  7. 2024Explaining Datasets in Words: Statistical Models with Natural Language Parameterscited by 21
  8. 2025Graph of Attacks with Pruning: Optimizing Stealthy Jailbreak Prompt Generation for Enhanced LLM Content Moderationcited by 11
  9. 2025Blink of an eye: a simple theory for feature localization in generative modelscited by 11
  10. 2025Interpretable Embeddings with Sparse Autoencoders: A Data Analysis Toolkitcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.