Classification Under Local Differential Privacy with Model Reversal and Model Averaging
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Local differential privacy (LDP) has become a central topic in data privacy research, offering strong privacy guarantees by perturbing user data at the source and removing the need for a trusted curator. However, the noise introduced by LDP often significantly reduces data utility. To address this issue, we reinterpret private learning under LDP as a transfer learning problem, where the noisy data serve as the source domain and the unobserved clean data as the target. We propose novel techniques specifically designed for LDP to improve classification performance without compromising privacy: (1) a noised binary feedback-based evaluation mechanism for estimating dataset utility; (2) model reversal, which salvages underperforming classifiers by inverting their decision boundaries; and (3) model averaging, which assigns weights to multiple reversed classifiers based on their estimated utility. We provide theoretical excess risk bounds under LDP and demonstrate how our methods reduce this risk. Empirical results on both simulated and real-world datasets show substantial improvements in classification accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.
Builds on
27 of 76 references.
References · 27
- 2014RAPPOR: Randomized Aggregatable Privacy-Preserving Ordinal Responsecited by 262
- 2017Collecting Telemetry Data Privatelycited by 147
- 2020LDP-Fed: Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 129
- 2016Minimax Optimal Procedures for Locally Private Estimationcited by 103
- 2020Transfer Learning for High-dimensional Linear Regression: Prediction, Estimation, and Minimax Optimalitycited by 89
- 2021Transfer Learning under High-dimensional Generalized Linear Modelscited by 69
- 2019Transfer Learning for Nonparametric Classification: Minimax Rate and Adaptive Classifiercited by 64
- 2020LDP-FL: Practical Private Aggregation in Federated Learning with Local Differential Privacycited by 63
- 2019Collecting and Analyzing Multidimensional Data with Local Differential Privacycited by 46
- 2020Local Differential Privacy and Its Applications: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 40
- 2020Encode, Shuffle, Analyze Privacy Revisited: Formalizations and Empirical Evaluationcited by 39
- 2020FedSel: Federated SGD under Local Differential Privacy with Top-k Dimension Selectioncited by 35
15 more
- 2016Collecting and Analyzing Data from Smart Device Users with Local Differential Privacycited by 25
- 2019Classification under local differential privacycited by 9
- 2023Optimal Locally Private Nonparametric Classification with Public Datacited by 7
- 2021Random Sampling Plus Fake Data: Multidimensional Frequency Estimates With Local Differential Privacycited by 6
- 2016Optimal Bayes Classifiers for Functional Data and Density Ratioscited by 5
- 2019Profile-Based Privacy for Locally Private Computationscited by 5
- 2021Improving the utility of locally differentially private protocols for longitudinal and multidimensional frequency estimatescited by 5
- 2023Practical Solutions in Fully Homomorphic Encryption -- A Survey Analyzing Existing Acceleration Methodscited by 5
- 2023Geometry of Sensitivity: Twice Sampling and Hybrid Clipping in Differential Privacy with Optimal Gaussian Noise and Application to Deep Learningcited by 5
- 2023On Excess Risk Convergence Rates of Neural Network Classifierscited by 3
- 2017Classification of functional fragments by regularized linear classifiers with domain selectioncited by 2
- 2019Danger of using fully homomorphic encryption: A look at Microsoft SEALcited by 2
- 2021A reproducing kernel Hilbert space framework for functional data classificationcited by 2
- 2022Lemmas of Differential Privacycited by 2
- 2023A Survey of Local Differential Privacy and Its Variantscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.