Mining Generalizable Activation Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The choice of activation function is an active area of research, with different proposals aimed at improving optimization, while maintaining expressivity. Additionally, the activation function can significantly alter the implicit inductive bias of the architecture, controlling its non-linear behavior. In this paper, in line with previous work, we argue that evolutionary search provides a useful framework for finding new activation functions, while we also make two novel observations. The first is that modern pipelines, such as AlphaEvolve, which relies on frontier LLMs as a mutator operator, allows for a much wider and flexible search space; e.g., over all possible python functions within a certain FLOP budget, eliminating the need for manually constructed search spaces. In addition, these pipelines will be biased towards meaningful activation functions, given their ability to represent common knowledge, leading to a potentially more efficient search of the space. The second observation is that, through this framework, one can target not only performance improvements but also activation functions that encode particular inductive biases. This can be done by using performance on out-of-distribution data as a fitness function, reflecting the degree to which the architecture respects the inherent structure in the data in a manner independent of distribution shifts. We carry an empirical exploration of this proposal and show that relatively small scale synthetic datasets can be sufficient for AlphaEvolve to discover meaningful activations.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2026.
Builds on
13 of 26 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
- 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,489
- 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 763
- 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
- 2014On the Number of Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networkscited by 378
- 2016On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural Networkscited by 302
- 2021Activation Functions in Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey and Benchmarkcited by 153
- 2022The CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmarkcited by 103
1 more
- 2022A Generalist Neural Algorithmic Learnercited by 58
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026EvoMem: Memory-Augmented Evolution for Code Optimization11 Aug 2026
- 2026ReBRAC-v2: The Return of the King2 Aug 2026
- 2026Let the Abyss Stare Back Adaptive Falsification for Autonomous Scientific Discovery30 Mar 2026