SE-Bench: Benchmarking Self-Evolution with Knowledge Internalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
True self-evolution requires agents to act as lifelong learners that internalize novel experiences to solve future problems. However, rigorously measuring this foundational capability is hindered by two obstacles: the entanglement of prior knowledge, where ``new'' knowledge may appear in pre-training data, and the entanglement of reasoning complexity, where failures may stem from problem difficulty rather than an inability to recall learned knowledge. We introduce SE-Bench, a diagnostic environment that obfuscates the NumPy library and its API doc into a pseudo-novel package with randomized identifiers. Agents are trained to internalize this package and evaluated on simple coding tasks without access to documentation, yielding a clean setting where tasks are trivial with the new API doc but impossible for base models without it. Our investigation reveals three insights: (1) the Open-Book Paradox, where training with reference documentation inhibits retention, requiring "Closed-Book Training" to force knowledge compression into weights; (2) the RL Gap, where standard RL fails to internalize new knowledge completely due to PPO clipping and negative gradients; and (3) the viability of Self-Play for internalization, proving models can learn from self-generated, noisy tasks when coupled with SFT, but not RL. Overall, SE-Bench establishes a rigorous diagnostic platform for self-evolution with knowledge internalization. Our code and dataset can be found at https://github.com/thunlp/SE-Bench.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
33 of 46 references.
References · 33
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
- 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
- 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learnerscited by 814
- 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 763
- 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
- 2025Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Modelscited by 349
21 more
- 2025Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Datacited by 323
- 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agentscited by 294
- 2024Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Modelscited by 292
- 2024CodeAgent: Enhancing Code Generation with Tool-Integrated Agent Systems for Real-World Repo-level Coding Challengescited by 278
- 2025DeepResearcher: Scaling Deep Research via Reinforcement Learning in Real-world Environmentscited by 268
- 2025ReasoningBank: Scaling Agent Self-Evolving with Reasoning Memorycited by 253
- 2025SWE-RL: Advancing LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning on Open Software Evolutioncited by 246
- 2024WebRL: Training LLM Web Agents via Self-Evolving Online Curriculum Reinforcement Learningcited by 243
- 2025R-Zero: Self-Evolving Reasoning LLM from Zero Datacited by 210
- 2025Spurious Rewards: Rethinking Training Signals in RLVRcited by 199
- 2025Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contaminationcited by 81
- 2025Blending Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning with Prefix Samplingcited by 57
- 2025MemoryBench: A Benchmark for Memory and Continual Learning in LLM Systemscited by 56
- 2025ThetaEvolve: Test-time Learning on Open Problemscited by 52
- 2025Huxley-G"odel Machine: Human-Level Coding Agent Development by an Approximation of the Optimal Self-Improving Machinecited by 44
- 2025MM-BrowseComp: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Browsing Agentscited by 39
- 2026POPE: Learning to Reason on Hard Problems via Privileged On-Policy Explorationcited by 39
- 2016The AGI Containment Problemcited by 36
- 2026Reuse your FLOPs: Scaling RL on Hard Problems by Conditioning on Very Off-Policy Prefixescited by 16
- 2025SSRL: Self-Search Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
- 2025RefineBench: Evaluating Refinement Capability of Language Models via Checklistscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026To See is Not to Master: Teaching LLMs to Use Private Libraries for Code Generationcited by 3
- 2026The Working Set of a Coding Agent: Coherence Debt in Repository-Scale Taskscited by 1
- 2026PACE-Bench: Benchmarking Physics Adaptation via Code Evolution in Dynamic Environmentscited by 0
- 2026StudyBench: Can Self-Evolution Squeeze Textbooks for Olympiad Capability?cited by 0
- 2026ExplorationBench: Measuring AI Systems' Exploration in Verifiable Alien Worldscited by 0
- 2026ExplorationBench: Measuring AI Systems' Exploration in Verifiable Alien Worlds24 Sep 2026
- 2026StudyBench: Can Self-Evolution Squeeze Textbooks for Olympiad Capability?1 Sep 2026
- 2026The Working Set of a Coding Agent: Coherence Debt in Repository-Scale Tasks17 Aug 2026
- 2026PACE-Bench: Benchmarking Physics Adaptation via Code Evolution in Dynamic Environments14 Aug 2026
- 2026To See is Not to Master: Teaching LLMs to Use Private Libraries for Code Generation16 Mar 2026