Superposition Without Interference? Towards Isolated Interventions via Almost Orthogonal Features in Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A central premise in mechanistic interpretability is that meaningful concepts in language models are represented by linear features in activation space. For such features to support reliable interventions, manipulating one feature should not substantially alter the effects of others. In practice, however, feature entanglement leads to interference such that localized interventions can have unintended downstream effects. Motivated by the _Independent Causal Mechanisms_ principle, we propose to constrain internal features to be almost orthogonal. We argue that this promotes modular representations amenable to causal intervention. We formalize this problem by characterizing the gap between an idealized isolated intervention and its realized effect on model outputs in terms of feature interference. We upper-bound the propagation of feature interference in terms of the self-coherence of the feature dictionary, and relate this discrepancy to an explicit orthogonality regularization on the dictionary itself. Empirically, we show that this regularization enables more isolated interventions on mathematical reasoning concepts while preserving model performance. Our code is available under https://github.com/mrtzmllr/sae-icm.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
28 of 51 references.
References · 28
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 533
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 530
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 209
- 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 194
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 148
- 2025SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model Interpretabilitycited by 118
16 more
- 2024Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Modelscited by 106
- 2023Learning Linear Causal Representations from Interventions under General Nonlinear Mixingcited by 92
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different Featurescited by 86
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysiscited by 80
- 2024On the Origins of Linear Representations in Large Language Modelscited by 76
- 2022Causal de Finetti: On the Identification of Invariant Causal Structure in Exchangeable Datacited by 42
- 2025Weight-sparse transformers have interpretable circuitscited by 40
- 2024Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability with Feature-Aligned Sparse Autoencoderscited by 25
- 2025From Colors to Classes: Emergence of Concepts in Vision Transformerscited by 23
- 2025Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Superpositioncited by 13
- 2024Do Finetti: On Causal Effects for Exchangeable Datacited by 11
- 2025OrtSAE: Orthogonal Sparse Autoencoders Uncover Atomic Featurescited by 7
- 2025Low-Rank Adapting Models for Sparse Autoencoderscited by 6
- 2025Counterfactual reasoning: an analysis of in-context emergencecited by 4
- 2016On the uniqueness and stability of dictionaries for sparse representation of noisy signalscited by 1
- 2026On the Emergence and Test-Time Use of Structural Information in Large Language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Causality is Key for Interpretability Claims to Generalisecited by 8
- 2026Interference Beyond Geometry in Concept Extractioncited by 0
- 2026Interference Beyond Geometry in Concept Extraction28 Sep 2026
- 2026Causality is Key for Interpretability Claims to Generalise18 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms?
- 2025Discovering Hierarchical Latent Capabilities of Language Models via Causal Representation Learning
- 2026Do Sparse Autoencoders Identify Reasoning Features in Language Models?
- 2026Measuring Semantic Abstractness of SAE Features via Nonlocality
- 2026The Illusion of Superposition? A Principled Analysis of Latent Thinking in Language Models
- 2025Out-of-Context Reasoning in Large Language Models
- 2025I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025A Comparative Analysis of Sparse Autoencoder and Activation Difference in Language Model Steering