Steering LLMs via Scalable Interactive Oversight
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As Large Language Models increasingly automate complex, long-horizon tasks such as vibe coding, a supervision gap has emerged. While models excel at execution, users often struggle to guide them effectively due to insufficient domain expertise, the difficulty of articulating precise intent, and the inability to reliably validate complex outputs. It presents a critical challenge in scalable oversight: enabling humans to responsibly steer AI systems on tasks that surpass their own ability to specify or verify. To tackle this, we propose Scalable Interactive Oversight, a framework that decomposes complex intent into a recursive tree of manageable decisions to amplify human supervision. Rather than relying on open-ended prompting, our system elicits low-burden feedback at each node and recursively aggregates these signals into precise global guidance. Validated in web development task, our framework enables non-experts to produce expert-level Product Requirement Documents, achieving a 54% improvement in alignment. Crucially, we demonstrate that this framework can be optimized via Reinforcement Learning using only online user feedback, offering a practical pathway for maintaining human control as AI scales.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.
Builds on
20 of 36 references.
References · 20
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
- 2018AI safety via debatecited by 384
- 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 372
- 2021Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedbackcited by 287
- 2022Measuring Progress on Scalable Oversight for Large Language Modelscited by 212
- 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modelingcited by 170
- 2024LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugscited by 138
- 2016The Off-Switch Gamecited by 97
8 more
- 2025Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivitycited by 93
- 2025AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progresscited by 69
- 2024RMB: Comprehensively Benchmarking Reward Models in LLM Alignmentcited by 60
- 2024Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Critique Models with Test-Time and Training-Time Supervisioncited by 60
- 2024Towards Human-centered Proactive Conversational Agentscited by 48
- 2025Training Proactive and Personalized LLM Agentscited by 42
- 2025A Survey of Vibe Coding with Large Language Modelscited by 25
- 2025How Developers Interact with AI: A Taxonomy of Human-AI Collaboration in Software Engineeringcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.