mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining the Explainer: Understanding the Inner Workings of Transformer-based Symbolic Regression Models

arXiv 2602.03506 ↗First posted 3 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Following their success across many domains, transformers have also proven effective for symbolic regression (SR); however, the internal mechanisms underlying their generation of mathematical operators remain largely unexplored. Although mechanistic interpretability has successfully identified circuits in language and vision models, it has not yet been applied to SR. In this article, we introduce PATCHES, an evolutionary circuit discovery algorithm that identifies compact and correct circuits for SR. Using PATCHES, we isolate 28 circuits, providing the first circuit-level characterisation of an SR transformer. We validate these findings through a robust causal evaluation framework based on key notions such as faithfulness, completeness, and minimality. Our analysis shows that mean patching with performance-based evaluation most reliably isolates functionally correct circuits. In contrast, we demonstrate that direct logit attribution and probing classifiers primarily capture correlational features rather than causal ones, limiting their utility for circuit discovery. Overall, these results establish SR as a high-potential application domain for mechanistic interpretability and propose a principled methodology for circuit discovery.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Feb 2026.

Builds on

25 of 43 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  4. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  5. 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,130
  6. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  7. 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 700
  8. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  9. 2016The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorialcited by 364
  10. 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 328
  11. 2023How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language modelcited by 199
  12. 2024How to use and interpret activation patchingcited by 191
13 more
  1. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 185
  2. 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 144
  3. 2024Have Faith in Faithfulness: Going Beyond Circuit Overlap When Finding Model Mechanismscited by 144
  4. 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 72
  5. 2024ICLR: In-Context Learning of Representationscited by 49
  6. 2024NNsight and NDIF: Democratizing Access to Open-Weight Foundation Model Internalscited by 43
  7. 2023Deep Generative Symbolic Regressioncited by 27
  8. 2024Transformer Circuit Faithfulness Metrics are not Robustcited by 18
  9. 2023Towards Interpretable Sequence Continuation: Analyzing Shared Circuits in Large Language Modelscited by 14
  10. 2024Detecting and Understanding Vulnerabilities in Language Models via Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 13
  11. 2024The Cognitive Revolution in Interpretability: From Explaining Behavior to Interpreting Representations and Algorithmscited by 13
  12. 2024Automatic Discovery of Visual Circuitscited by 12
  13. 2025How do Large Language Models Understand Relevance? A Mechanistic Interpretability Perspectivecited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.