Privately Fine-Tuned LLMs Preserve Temporal Dynamics in Tabular Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Research on differentially private synthetic tabular data has largely focused on independent and identically distributed rows where each record corresponds to a unique individual. This perspective neglects the temporal complexity in longitudinal datasets, such as electronic health records, where a user contributes an entire (sub) table of sequential events. While practitioners might attempt to model such data by flattening user histories into high-dimensional vectors for use with standard marginal-based mechanisms, we demonstrate that this strategy is insufficient. Flattening fails to preserve temporal coherence even when it maintains valid marginal distributions. We introduce PATH, a novel generative framework that treats the full table as the unit of synthesis and leverages the autoregressive capabilities of privately fine-tuned large language models. Extensive evaluations show that PATH effectively captures long-range dependencies that traditional methods miss. Empirically, our method reduces the distributional distance to real trajectories by over 60% and reduces state transition errors by nearly 50% compared to leading marginal mechanisms while achieving similar marginal fidelity.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.
Builds on
28 of 40 references.
References · 28
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 643
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
- 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 392
- 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 290
- 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 258
- 2024Large Language Models(LLMs) on Tabular Data: Prediction, Generation, and Understanding -- A Surveycited by 157
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
- 2022AIM: An Adaptive and Iterative Mechanism for Differentially Private Synthetic Datacited by 88
16 more
- 2024Gecko: Versatile Text Embeddings Distilled from Large Language Modelscited by 81
- 2019Graphical-model based estimation and inference for differential privacycited by 73
- 2023Harnessing large-language models to generate private synthetic textcited by 65
- 2021Iterative Methods for Private Synthetic Data: Unifying Framework and New Methodscited by 58
- 2022When Does Differentially Private Learning Not Suffer in High Dimensions?cited by 48
- 2024TabPFGen -- Tabular Data Generation with TabPFNcited by 26
- 2021Divergence Frontiers for Generative Models: Sample Complexity, Quantization Effects, and Frontier Integralscited by 18
- 2024Differentially Private Tabular Data Synthesis using Large Language Modelscited by 16
- 2023DP-TBART: A Transformer-based Autoregressive Model for Differentially Private Tabular Data Generationcited by 13
- 2025Benchmarking Differentially Private Tabular Data Synthesiscited by 13
- 2025How to DP-fy Your Data: A Practical Guide to Generating Synthetic Data With Differential Privacycited by 11
- 2023Continual Release of Differentially Private Synthetic Data from Longitudinal Data Collectionscited by 7
- 2024Differential Privacy Under Class Imbalance: Methods and Empirical Insightscited by 6
- 2022Epistemic Parity: Reproducibility as an Evaluation Metric for Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2024DP-2Stage: Adapting Language Models as Differentially Private Tabular Data Generatorscited by 5
- 2024NetDPSyn: Synthesizing Network Traces under Differential Privacycited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.