Active Transfer Bagging: A New Approach for Accelerated Active Learning Acquisition of Data by Combined Transfer Learning and Bagging Based Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern machine learning has achieved remarkable success on many problems, but this success often depends on the existence of large, labeled datasets. While active learning can dramatically reduce labeling cost when annotations are expensive, early performance is frequently dominated by the initial seed set, typically chosen at random. In many applications, however, related or approximate datasets are readily available and can be leveraged to construct a better seed set. We introduce a new method for selecting the seed data set for active learning, Active-Transfer Bagging (ATBagging). ATBagging estimates the informativeness of candidate data point from a Bayesian interpretation of bagged ensemble models by comparing in-bag and out-of-bag predictive distributions from the labeled dataset, yielding an information-gain proxy. To avoid redundant selections, we impose feature-space diversity by sampling a determinantal point process (DPP) whose kernel uses Random Fourier Features and a quality-diversity factorization that incorporates the informativeness scores. This same blended method is used for selection of new data points to collect during the active learning phase. We evaluate ATBagging on four real-world datasets covering both target-transfer and feature-shift scenarios (QM9, ERA5, Forbes 2000, and Beijing PM2.5). Across seed sizes nseed = 10-100, ATBagging improves or ties early active learning and increases area under the learning-curve relative to alternative seed subset selection methodologies in almost all cases, with strongest benefits in low-data regimes. Thus, ATBagging provides a low-cost, high reward means to initiating active learning-based data collection.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.
Builds on
14 of 41 references.
References · 14
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 432
- 2018A Survey on Data Collection for Machine Learning: a Big Data -- AI Integration Perspectivecited by 112
- 2023Prediction-Oriented Bayesian Active Learningcited by 62
- 2022A Framework and Benchmark for Deep Batch Active Learning for Regressioncited by 49
- 2022Warm Start Active Learning with Proxy Labels & Selection via Semi-Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 21
- 2022Labeling instructions matter in biomedical image analysiscited by 20
- 2020On Initial Pools for Deep Active Learningcited by 18
- 2023Black-Box Batch Active Learning for Regressioncited by 12
- 2020Active and Incremental Learning with Weak Supervisioncited by 8
- 2021On The State of Data In Computer Vision: Human Annotations Remain Indispensable for Developing Deep Learning Modelscited by 6
- 2021A Survey on Machine Learning Techniques for Auto Labeling of Video, Audio, and Text Datacited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.