Alignment-Aware Model Adaptation via Feedback-Guided Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning is the primary mechanism for adapting foundation models to downstream tasks; however, standard approaches largely optimize task objectives in isolation and do not account for secondary yet critical alignment objectives (e.g., safety and hallucination avoidance). As a result, downstream fine-tuning can degrade alignment and fail to correct pre-existing misaligned behavior. We propose an alignment-aware fine-tuning framework that integrates feedback from an external alignment signal through policy-gradient-based regularization. Our method introduces an adaptive gating mechanism that dynamically balances supervised and alignment-driven gradients on a per-sample basis, prioritizing uncertain or misaligned cases while allowing well-aligned examples to follow standard supervised updates. The framework further learns abstention behavior for fully misaligned inputs, incorporating conservative responses directly into the fine-tuned model. Experiments on general and domain-specific instruction-tuning benchmarks demonstrate consistent reductions in harmful and hallucinated outputs without sacrificing downstream task performance. Additional analyses show robustness to adversarial fine-tuning, prompt-based attacks, and unsafe initializations, establishing adaptively gated alignment optimization as an effective approach for alignment-preserving and alignment-recovering model adaptation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.
Builds on
55 of 68 references.
References · 55
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
38 more
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
- 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
- 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 691
- 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
- 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 450
- 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 450
- 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 377
- 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 364
- 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 329
- 2023How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowballcited by 310
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMscited by 276
- 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 226
- 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluationcited by 134
- 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 114
- 2023Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinatecited by 114
- 2024What is in Your Safe Data? Identifying Benign Data that Breaks Safetycited by 114
- 2023R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know'cited by 106
- 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 106
- 2024Keeping LLMs Aligned After Fine-tuning: The Crucial Role of Prompt Templatescited by 94
- 2024Booster: Tackling Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Perturbationcited by 92
- 2024Lisa: Lazy Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning Attackcited by 89
- 2024Unfamiliar Finetuning Examples Control How Language Models Hallucinatecited by 85
- 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
- 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 80
- 2023Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinationscited by 78
- 2024Rejection Improves Reliability: Training LLMs to Refuse Unknown Questions Using RL from Knowledge Feedbackcited by 64
- 2025Improving LLM Safety Alignment with Dual-Objective Optimizationcited by 40
- 2025Stabilizing Knowledge, Promoting Reasoning: Dual-Token Constraints for RLVRcited by 38
- 2024NLSR: Neuron-Level Safety Realignment of Large Language Models Against Harmful Fine-Tuningcited by 37
- 2025Deep Ignorance: Filtering Pretraining Data Builds Tamper-Resistant Safeguards into Open-Weight LLMscited by 37
- 2023BioInstruct: Instruction Tuning of Large Language Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 25
- 2025Benign Samples Matter! Fine-tuning On Outlier Benign Samples Severely Breaks Safetycited by 22
- 2025TruthRL: Incentivizing Truthful LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
- 2024Low-Rank Rescaled Vision Transformer Fine-Tuning: A Residual Design Approachcited by 18
- 2023Multi-party Goal Tracking with LLMs: Comparing Pre-training, Fine-tuning, and Prompt Engineeringcited by 13
- 2025SDD: Self-Degraded Defense against Malicious Fine-tuningcited by 13
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.