mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Alignment-Aware Model Adaptation via Feedback-Guided Optimization

arXiv 2602.02258 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning is the primary mechanism for adapting foundation models to downstream tasks; however, standard approaches largely optimize task objectives in isolation and do not account for secondary yet critical alignment objectives (e.g., safety and hallucination avoidance). As a result, downstream fine-tuning can degrade alignment and fail to correct pre-existing misaligned behavior. We propose an alignment-aware fine-tuning framework that integrates feedback from an external alignment signal through policy-gradient-based regularization. Our method introduces an adaptive gating mechanism that dynamically balances supervised and alignment-driven gradients on a per-sample basis, prioritizing uncertain or misaligned cases while allowing well-aligned examples to follow standard supervised updates. The framework further learns abstention behavior for fully misaligned inputs, incorporating conservative responses directly into the fine-tuned model. Experiments on general and domain-specific instruction-tuning benchmarks demonstrate consistent reductions in harmful and hallucinated outputs without sacrificing downstream task performance. Additional analyses show robustness to adversarial fine-tuning, prompt-based attacks, and unsafe initializations, establishing adaptively gated alignment optimization as an effective approach for alignment-preserving and alignment-recovering model adaptation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.

Builds on

55 of 68 references.

References · 55

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  6. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  7. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  8. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuningcited by 2,855
  9. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  10. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
  11. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  12. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,234
38 more
  1. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  2. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 988
  3. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 828
  4. 2021Retrieval Augmentation Reduces Hallucination in Conversationcited by 691
  5. 2023Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 630
  6. 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
  7. 2024Jailbreaking Leading Safety-Aligned LLMs with Simple Adaptive Attackscited by 450
  8. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 450
  9. 2023Safety-Tuned LLaMAs: Lessons From Improving the Safety of Large Language Models that Follow Instructionscited by 377
  10. 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 364
  11. 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 329
  12. 2023How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowballcited by 310
  13. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMscited by 276
  14. 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 226
  15. 2023Few-shot Fine-tuning vs. In-context Learning: A Fair Comparison and Evaluationcited by 134
  16. 2015Minimum Risk Training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 114
  17. 2023Calibrated Language Models Must Hallucinatecited by 114
  18. 2024What is in Your Safe Data? Identifying Benign Data that Breaks Safetycited by 114
  19. 2023R-Tuning: Instructing Large Language Models to Say `I Don't Know'cited by 106
  20. 2024Rule Based Rewards for Language Model Safetycited by 106
  21. 2024Keeping LLMs Aligned After Fine-tuning: The Crucial Role of Prompt Templatescited by 94
  22. 2024Booster: Tackling Harmful Fine-tuning for Large Language Models via Attenuating Harmful Perturbationcited by 92
  23. 2024Lisa: Lazy Safety Alignment for Large Language Models against Harmful Fine-tuning Attackcited by 89
  24. 2024Unfamiliar Finetuning Examples Control How Language Models Hallucinatecited by 85
  25. 2019On the Weaknesses of Reinforcement Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 82
  26. 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 80
  27. 2023Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinationscited by 78
  28. 2024Rejection Improves Reliability: Training LLMs to Refuse Unknown Questions Using RL from Knowledge Feedbackcited by 64
  29. 2025Improving LLM Safety Alignment with Dual-Objective Optimizationcited by 40
  30. 2025Stabilizing Knowledge, Promoting Reasoning: Dual-Token Constraints for RLVRcited by 38
  31. 2024NLSR: Neuron-Level Safety Realignment of Large Language Models Against Harmful Fine-Tuningcited by 37
  32. 2025Deep Ignorance: Filtering Pretraining Data Builds Tamper-Resistant Safeguards into Open-Weight LLMscited by 37
  33. 2023BioInstruct: Instruction Tuning of Large Language Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 25
  34. 2025Benign Samples Matter! Fine-tuning On Outlier Benign Samples Severely Breaks Safetycited by 22
  35. 2025TruthRL: Incentivizing Truthful LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
  36. 2024Low-Rank Rescaled Vision Transformer Fine-Tuning: A Residual Design Approachcited by 18
  37. 2023Multi-party Goal Tracking with LLMs: Comparing Pre-training, Fine-tuning, and Prompt Engineeringcited by 13
  38. 2025SDD: Self-Degraded Defense against Malicious Fine-tuningcited by 13

50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.