Edit Knowledge, Not Just Facts via Multi-Step Reasoning over Background Stories
On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Enabling artificial intelligence systems, particularly large language models, to update knowledge and flexibly apply it during reasoning remains a central challenge. Existing knowledge editing approaches emphasize atomic facts, improving factual recall but often failing to integrate updated information into a coherent framework usable across contexts. In this work, we argue that knowledge update is fundamentally a reasoning problem rather than a memorization problem. Consequently, a model should be trained in situations where the new information is instrumental to solving a task, combined with pre-existing knowledge, and exercised through multi-step reasoning. Based on this insight, we propose a training strategy based on three principles. First, new knowledge is introduced as a coherent background story that contextualizes novel facts and explains their relation to existing knowledge. Second, models are trained using self-generated multi-hop questions that require multi-step reasoning involving the new information. Third, training is done using knowledge distillation, forcing a student model to internalize the teacher's reasoning behavior without access to the novel information. Experiments show that models trained with this strategy effectively leverage newly acquired knowledge during reasoning and achieve remarkable performance on challenging questions that require combining multiple new facts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 16 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.
Builds on
16 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Robust Knowledge Editing via Explicit Reasoning Chains for Distractor-Resilient Multi-Hop QA1 Sep
- 2024DeepEdit: Knowledge Editing as Decoding with Constraints19 Jan
Other references · 14
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,146
- 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
- 2025From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 319
- 2025Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 291
- 2020Modifying Memories in Transformer Modelscited by 222
- 2024A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Modelscited by 157
- 2022Learning by Distilling Contextcited by 128
- 2024Efficient Knowledge Injection in LLMs via Self-Distillationcited by 22
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Learning to Edit Knowledge via Instruction-based Chain-of-Thought Prompting
- 2025CaKE: Circuit-aware Editing Enables Generalizable Knowledge Learners
- 2024Enhancing Multi-hop Reasoning through Knowledge Erasure in Large Language Model Editing
- 2026Addressing the Reasoning Gap: Mechanistic Circuit-Based Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models
- 2024Investigating Multi-Hop Factual Shortcuts in Knowledge Editing of Large Language Models
- 2025Decoupling Reasoning and Knowledge Injection for In-Context Knowledge Editing
- 2026On the Limitations of Rank-One Model Editing in Answering Multi-hop Questions
- 2025ACE: Attribution-Controlled Knowledge Editing for Multi-hop Factual Recall