mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PRISM: Festina Lente Proactivity -- Risk-Sensitive, Uncertainty-Aware Deliberation for Proactive Agents

arXiv 2602.01532 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2026cs.AI cs.HCcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Proactive agents must decide not only what to say but also whether and when to intervene. Many current systems rely on brittle heuristics or indiscriminate long reasoning, which offers little control over the benefit-burden tradeoff. We formulate the problem as cost-sensitive selective intervention and present PRISM, a novel framework that couples a decision-theoretic gate with a dual-process reasoning architecture. At inference time, the agent intervenes only when a calibrated probability of user acceptance exceeds a threshold derived from asymmetric costs of missed help and false alarms. Inspired by festina lente (Latin: "make haste slowly"), we gate by an acceptance-calibrated, cost-derived threshold and invoke a resource-intensive Slow mode with counterfactual checks only near the decision boundary, concentrating computation on ambiguous and high-stakes cases. Training uses gate-aligned, schema-locked distillation: a teacher running the full PRISM pipeline provides dense, executable supervision on unlabeled interaction traces, while the student learns a response policy that is explicitly decoupled from the intervention gate to enable tunable and auditable control. On ProactiveBench, PRISM reduces false alarms by 22.78% and improves F1 by 20.14% over strong baselines. These results show that principled decision-theoretic gating, paired with selective slow reasoning and aligned distillation, yields proactive agents that are precise, computationally efficient, and controllable. To facilitate reproducibility, we release our code, models, and resources at https://prism-festinalente.github.io/; all experiments use the open-source ProactiveBench benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2026.

Builds on

25 of 38 references.

References · 25

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  6. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  7. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  8. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  9. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  10. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
  11. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  12. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
13 more
  1. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
  2. 2018Born Again Neural Networkscited by 539
  3. 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 479
  4. 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 354
  5. 2019SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Optioncited by 333
  6. 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 228
  7. 2024Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without Promptingcited by 208
  8. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
  9. 2025Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertaintycited by 107
  10. 2024Proactive Agent: Shifting LLM Agents from Reactive Responses to Active Assistancecited by 84
  11. 2024Ask-before-Plan: Proactive Language Agents for Real-World Planningcited by 59
  12. 2023Regression with Cost-based Rejectioncited by 11
  13. 2024Reward Guidance for Reinforcement Learning Tasks Based on Large Language Models: The LMGT Frameworkcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.