Causally Disentangled Contrastive Learning for Multilingual Speaker Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-supervised speaker embeddings are widely used in speaker verification systems, but prior work has shown that they often encode sensitive demographic attributes, raising fairness and privacy concerns. This paper investigates the extent to which demographic information, specifically gender, age, and accent, is present in SimCLR-trained speaker embeddings and whether such leakage can be mitigated without severely degrading speaker verification performance. We study two debiasing strategies: adversarial training through gradient reversal and a causal bottleneck architecture that explicitly separates demographic and residual information. Demographic leakage is quantified using both linear and nonlinear probing classifiers, while speaker verification performance is evaluated using ROC-AUC and EER. Our results show that gender information is strongly and linearly encoded in baseline embeddings, whereas age and accent are weaker and primarily nonlinearly represented. Adversarial debiasing reduces gender leakage but has limited effect on age and accent and introduces a clear trade-off with verification accuracy. The causal bottleneck further suppresses demographic information, particularly in the residual representation, but incurs substantial performance degradation. These findings highlight fundamental limitations in mitigating demographic leakage in self-supervised speaker embeddings and clarify the trade-offs inherent in current debiasing approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2026.
Builds on
20 of 53 references.
References · 20
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
- 2019SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 1,355
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2020ECAPA-TDNN: Emphasized Channel Attention, Propagation and Aggregation in TDNN Based Speaker Verificationcited by 606
- 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
- 2023Sentence Embedding Leaks More Information than You Expect: Generative Embedding Inversion Attack to Recover the Whole Sentencecited by 81
- 2022Bias in Automated Speaker Recognitioncited by 20
- 2019Probing the Information Encoded in X-vectorscited by 18
- 2021Community-Based Fact-Checking on Twitter's Birdwatch Platformcited by 13
- 2022Improving fairness in speaker verification via Group-adapted Fusion Networkcited by 11
8 more
- 2023Did the Roll-Out of Community Notes Reduce Engagement With Misinformation on X/Twitter?cited by 11
- 2022To train or not to train adversarially: A study of bias mitigation strategies for speaker recognitioncited by 8
- 2024Who Checks the Checkers? Exploring Source Credibility in Twitter's Community Notescited by 6
- 2025Demographic Attributes Prediction from Speech Using WavLM Embeddingscited by 4
- 2025WavShape: Information-Theoretic Speech Representation Learning for Fair and Privacy-Aware Audio Processingcited by 2
- 2025Fairness Metric Design Exploration in Multi-Domain Moral Sentiment Classification using Transformer-Based Modelscited by 2
- 2026Assessing the quality and coherence of word embeddings after SCM-based intersectional bias mitigationcited by 2
- 2024"I don't trust them": Exploring Perceptions of Fact-checking Entities for Flagging Online Misinformationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.