Improving fairness in speaker verification via Group-adapted Fusion Network
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern speaker verification models use deep neural networks to encode utterance audio into discriminative embedding vectors. During the training process, these networks are typically optimized to differentiate arbitrary speakers. This learning process biases the learning of fine voice characteristics towards dominant demographic groups, which can lead to an unfair performance disparity across different groups. This is observed especially with underrepresented demographic groups sharing similar voice characteristics. In this work, we investigate the fairness of speaker verification models on controlled datasets with imbalanced gender distributions, providing direct evidence that model performance suffers for underrepresented groups. To mitigate this disparity we propose the group-adapted fusion network (GFN) architecture, a modular architecture based on group embedding adaptation and score fusion. We show that our method alleviates model unfairness by improving speaker verification both overall and for individual groups. Given imbalanced group representation in training, our proposed method achieves overall equal error rate (EER) reduction of 9.6% to 29.0% relative, reduces minority group EER by 13.7% to 18.6%, and results in 20.0% to 25.4% less EER disparity, compared to baselines. The approach is applicable to other types of training data skew in speaker recognition systems.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2025Mind the Value-Action Gap: Do LLMs Act in Alignment with Their Values?cited by 49
- 2024ValueCompass: A Framework for Measuring Contextual Value Alignment Between Human and LLMscited by 20
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignmentcited by 15
- 2024HiddenSpeaker: Generate Imperceptible Unlearnable Audios for Speaker Verification Systemcited by 4
- 2026ValueFlow: Measuring the Propagation of Value Perturbations in Multi-Agent LLM Systemscited by 4
- 2023A Study on Bias and Fairness In Deep Speaker Recognitioncited by 2
- 2026Causally Disentangled Contrastive Learning for Multilingual Speaker Embeddingscited by 2
- 2022Graph-based Multi-View Fusion and Local Adaptation: Mitigating Within-Household Confusability for Speaker Identificationcited by 1
- 2023Cross-utterance ASR Rescoring with Graph-based Label Propagationcited by 1
- 2025CO-VADA: A Confidence-Oriented Voice Augmentation Debiasing Approach for Fair Speech Emotion Recognitioncited by 1
- 2026Value Alignment Tax: Measuring Value Trade-offs in LLM Alignmentcited by 1
- 2026Value Alignment Tax: Measuring Value Trade-offs in LLM Alignment12 Feb 2026
- 2026ValueFlow: Measuring the Propagation of Value Perturbations in Multi-Agent LLM Systems9 Feb 2026
- 2026Causally Disentangled Contrastive Learning for Multilingual Speaker Embeddings1 Feb 2026
- 2025CO-VADA: A Confidence-Oriented Voice Augmentation Debiasing Approach for Fair Speech Emotion Recognition6 Jun 2025
- 2025Mind the Value-Action Gap: Do LLMs Act in Alignment with Their Values?26 Jan 2025
- 2024ValueCompass: A Framework for Measuring Contextual Value Alignment Between Human and LLMs15 Sep 2024
- 2024Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment13 Jun 2024
- 2024HiddenSpeaker: Generate Imperceptible Unlearnable Audios for Speaker Verification System24 May 2024
- 2023Cross-utterance ASR Rescoring with Graph-based Label Propagation27 Mar 2023
- 2023A Study on Bias and Fairness In Deep Speaker Recognition14 Mar 2023
- 2022Graph-based Multi-View Fusion and Local Adaptation: Mitigating Within-Household Confusability for Speaker Identification8 Jul 2022