mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Partition of Unity Neural Networks for Interpretable Classification with Explicit Class Regions

arXiv 2602.00511 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2026cs.LG math.OCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce Partition of Unity Neural Networks (PUNNs), a neural-network architecture for multiclass classification based on the classical mathematical notion of a partition of unity. The starting point is the observation that the characteristic functions of ideal class regions form a partition of unity. PUNNs replace these discontinuous indicators by learned continuous functions [ h1,ldots,hC:mathcal X→[0,1] ] whose sum is identically one and whose values are interpreted directly as class probabilities. The partition functions are generated through a recursive family of input-dependent gates. This construction guarantees nonnegative class probabilities summing to one without a separate normalization layer such as softmax, while providing an explicit ordered factorization of each probability in terms of the gate values. The resulting gate trace gives an interpretable representation of how individual class probabilities are formed. The framework also allows multiple partition functions to represent a single class and admits both neural-network and geometry-informed realizations of the gates. We prove that PUNNs are dense in the space of continuous probability maps from compact subsets of mathbb Rd into the probability simplex. Thus, the recursive partition-of-unity structure retains universal approximation of continuous probabilistic classifiers, including maps whose components may vanish. Numerical experiments on synthetic datasets, MNIST, and CIFAR-100 illustrate the learned partitions, the effect of class ordering, and the use of multiple partition components per class. We also develop shape-informed gates that incorporate geometric information directly; when the chosen geometry is well matched to the class regions, these models achieve comparable accuracy with substantially fewer trainable parameters.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2026.

Builds on

13 of 36 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  6. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  7. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 916
  8. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  9. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
  10. 2019InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretabilitycited by 243
  11. 2015Provable approximation properties for deep neural networkscited by 60
  12. 2016Stick-Breaking Variational Autoencoderscited by 44
1 more
  1. 2021Partition of unity networks: deep hp-approximationcited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.