Cross-Modal Memory Compression for Efficient Multi-Agent Debate
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent debate can improve reasoning quality and reduce hallucinations, but it incurs rapidly growing context as debate rounds and agent count increase. Retaining full textual histories leads to token usage that can exceed context limits and often requires repeated summarization, adding overhead and compounding information loss. We introduce DebateOCR, a cross-modal compression framework that replaces long textual debate traces with compact image representations, which are then consumed through a dedicated vision encoder to condition subsequent rounds. This design compresses histories that commonly span tens to hundreds of thousands of tokens, cutting input tokens by more than 92% and yielding substantially lower compute cost and faster inference across multiple benchmarks. We further provide a theoretical perspective showing that diversity across agents supports recovery of omitted information: although any single compressed history may discard details, aggregating multiple agents' compressed views allows the collective representation to approach the information bottleneck with exponentially high probability.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 41 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2026.
Builds on
41 of 48 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 40
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
28 more
- 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
- 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,534
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2024How Far Are We to GPT-4V? Closing the Gap to Commercial Multimodal Models with Open-Source Suitescited by 1,033
- 2023Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Surveycited by 834
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
- 2019MathQA: Towards Interpretable Math Word Problem Solving with Operation-Based Formalismscited by 653
- 2024DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understandingcited by 559
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
- 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
- 2023Learning to Compress Prompts with Gist Tokenscited by 379
- 2023Adapting Language Models to Compress Contextscited by 350
- 2023ReConcile: Round-Table Conference Improves Reasoning via Consensus among Diverse LLMscited by 297
- 2024Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answerscited by 255
- 2023Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaborationcited by 246
- 2023Landmark Attention: Random-Access Infinite Context Length for Transformerscited by 206
- 2023In-context Autoencoder for Context Compression in a Large Language Modelcited by 190
- 2023Compressing Context to Enhance Inference Efficiency of Large Language Modelscited by 185
- 2024Pixtral 12Bcited by 174
- 2025DeepSeek-OCR: Contexts Optical Compressioncited by 174
- 2023Focused Transformer: Contrastive Training for Context Scalingcited by 133
- 2023Examining Inter-Consistency of Large Language Models Collaboration: An In-depth Analysis via Debatecited by 94
- 2023How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?cited by 92
- 2025Multiagent Finetuning: Self Improvement with Diverse Reasoning Chainscited by 90
- 2023Let Models Speak Ciphers: Multiagent Debate through Embeddingscited by 49
- 2025Vision-centric Token Compression in Large Language Modelcited by 21
- 2024Interpreting and Mitigating Hallucination in MLLMs through Multi-agent Debatecited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Remember and Reweight: Enhancing Multi-Agent Debate with Experience Memory and Confidence Estimation
- 2026Multi-Agent Debate with Memory Masking
- 2025R-Debater: Retrieval-Augmented Debate Generation through Argumentative Memory
- 2026Hear Both Sides: Efficient Multi-Agent Debate via Diversity-Aware Message Retention
- 2026AgentOCR: Reimagining Agent History via Optical Self-Compression
- 2026FOCUS: Training-Free Decision-Preserving Context Compression for LLM Agents
- 2026EquiMem: Calibrating Shared Memory in Multi-Agent Debate via Game-Theoretic Equilibrium
- 2026Mixture of Debaters: Learn to Debate at Architectural Level in Multi-Agent Reasoning