In-Run Data Shapley for Adam Optimizer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable data attribution is essential for mitigating bias and reducing computational waste in modern machine learning, with the Shapley value serving as the theoretical gold standard. While recent "In-Run" methods bypass the prohibitive cost of retraining by estimating contributions dynamically, they heavily rely on the linear structure of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and fail to capture the complex dynamics of adaptive optimizers like Adam. In this work, we demonstrate that data attribution is inherently optimizer-dependent: we show that SGD-based proxies diverge significantly from true contributions under Adam (Pearson R ≈ 0.11), rendering them ineffective for modern training pipelines. To bridge this gap, we propose Adam-Aware In-Run Data Shapley. We derive a closed-form approximation that restores additivity by redefining utility under a fixed-state assumption and enable scalable computation via a novel Linearized Ghost Approximation. This technique linearizes the variance-dependent scaling term, allowing us to compute pairwise gradient dot-products without materializing per-sample gradients. Extensive experiments show that our method achieves near-perfect fidelity to ground-truth marginal contributions (R > 0.99) while retaining ~95% of standard training throughput. Furthermore, our Adam-aware attribution significantly outperforms SGD-based baselines in data attribution downstream tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.
Builds on
29 of 41 references.
References · 29
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
- 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 279
- 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
- 2022Datamodels: Predicting Predictions from Training Datacited by 186
17 more
- 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 162
- 2019Efficient Task-Specific Data Valuation for Nearest Neighbor Algorithmscited by 147
- 2022Data Banzhaf: A Robust Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 126
- 2023DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion Modelscited by 121
- 2021Sampling Permutations for Shapley Value Estimationcited by 101
- 2024Data Shapley in One Training Runcited by 76
- 2022Measuring the Effect of Training Data on Deep Learning Predictions via Randomized Experimentscited by 50
- 2020A Multilinear Sampling Algorithm to Estimate Shapley Valuescited by 33
- 2024Training Data Attribution via Approximate Unrolled Differentiationcited by 33
- 2024Stochastic Amortization: A Unified Approach to Accelerate Feature and Data Attributioncited by 21
- 2025MAGIC: Near-Optimal Data Attribution for Deep Learningcited by 20
- 2019Estimation of the Shapley value by ergodic samplingcited by 15
- 2023A Note on "Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Value''cited by 11
- 2024HyperINF: Unleashing the HyperPower of the Schulz's Method for Data Influence Estimationcited by 7
- 2024Dissecting Representation Misalignment in Contrastive Learning via Influence Functioncited by 7
- 2025Evaluating Data Influence in Meta Learningcited by 4
- 2025Attributing Data for Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Stored in Optimizer State, Valued by Later Training: A Causal Account of Subliminal Trait Transfercited by 1
- 2026Scalable Attribution and Control of Model Behavior During Trainingcited by 0
- 2026Every Batch Is Its Own Validation Set: Leave-One-Out Gradient Matching for Online Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Every Batch Is Its Own Validation Set: Leave-One-Out Gradient Matching for Online Data Selection in LLM Fine-Tuning30 Sep 2026
- 2026Scalable Attribution and Control of Model Behavior During Training27 Sep 2026
- 2026Stored in Optimizer State, Valued by Later Training: A Causal Account of Subliminal Trait Transfer20 Aug 2026