mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HyperINF: Unleashing the HyperPower of the Schulz's Method for Data Influence Estimation

arXiv 2410.05090 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Influence functions provide a principled method to assess the contribution of individual training samples to a specific target. Yet, their high computational costs limit their applications on large-scale models and datasets. Existing methods proposed for influence function approximation have significantly reduced the computational overheads. However, they mostly suffer from inaccurate estimation due to the lack of strong convergence guarantees from the algorithm. The family of hyperpower methods are well-known for their rigorous convergence guarantees on matrix inverse approximation, while the matrix multiplication operation can involve intractable memory and computation costs on large-scale models. We propose HyperINF, an efficient and accurate influence function approximation method which leverages the hyperpower method, specifically Schulz's iterative algorithm. To deal with the computation-intensive matrix multiplication, we incorporate the generalized fisher information (GFIM) as a low-rank approximation of the Hessian matrix, which reduces the memory and computation overheads to constant costs independent of ranks on LoRA-tuned models. We first demonstrate the superior accuracy and stability of HyperINF compared to other baselines through a synthetic convergence simulation for matrix inversion. We further validate the efficacy of HyperINF through extensive real-world data attribution tasks, including mislabeled data detection and data selection for LLM and VLM fine-tuning. On LoRA-tuned models, HyperINF achieves superior downstream performance with minimal memory and computational overhead, while other baselines suffer from significant degradation. Our codebase is available at https://github.com/Blackzxy/HyperINF.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2024.

Builds on

46 of 83 references.

References · 46

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  5. 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  7. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  8. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  9. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  10. 2016Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotationscited by 2,646
  11. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  12. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
34 more
  1. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  2. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  3. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
  4. 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,544
  5. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,114
  6. 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,054
  7. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
  8. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  9. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  10. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  11. 2020TextCaps: a Dataset for Image Captioning with Reading Comprehensioncited by 398
  12. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
  13. 2024Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Modelscited by 336
  14. 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
  15. 2022Visual Spatial Reasoningcited by 288
  16. 2019QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Compositioncited by 248
  17. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
  18. 2023A Rank Stabilization Scaling Factor for Fine-Tuning with LoRAcited by 231
  19. 2020Retrieve, Program, Repeat: Complex Knowledge Base Question Answering via Alternate Meta-learningcited by 216
  20. 2019Limitations of the Empirical Fisher Approximation for Natural Gradient Descentcited by 213
  21. 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 162
  22. 2019Efficient Task-Specific Data Valuation for Nearest Neighbor Algorithmscited by 147
  23. 2018Fast Approximate Natural Gradient Descent in a Kronecker-factored Eigenbasiscited by 143
  24. 2024Adam-mini: Use Fewer Learning Rates To Gain Morecited by 134
  25. 2024Why Transformers Need Adam: A Hessian Perspectivecited by 123
  26. 2020FastIF: Scalable Influence Functions for Efficient Model Interpretation and Debuggingcited by 120
  27. 2023MoDS: Model-oriented Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 107
  28. 2023Instruction Mining: Instruction Data Selection for Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 57
  29. 2019Repairing without Retraining: Avoiding Disparate Impact with Counterfactual Distributionscited by 48
  30. 2023One-Shot Learning as Instruction Data Prospector for Large Language Modelscited by 43
  31. 2024SmallToLarge (S2L): Scalable Data Selection for Fine-tuning Large Language Models by Summarizing Training Trajectories of Small Modelscited by 43
  32. 2020RelatIF: Identifying Explanatory Training Examples via Relative Influencecited by 28
  33. 2024The Mirrored Influence Hypothesis: Efficient Data Influence Estimation by Harnessing Forward Passescited by 16
  34. 2024AdaFish: Fast low-rank parameter-efficient fine-tuning by using second-order informationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

7 papers.