mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Training LLMs with Fault Tolerant HSDP on 100,000 GPUs

arXiv 2602.00277 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2026cs.DC cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale training systems typically use synchronous training, requiring all GPUs to be healthy simultaneously. In our experience training on O(100K) GPUs, synchronous training results in a low efficiency due to frequent failures and long recovery time. To address this problem, we propose a novel training paradigm, Fault Tolerant Hybrid-Shared Data Parallelism (FT-HSDP). FT-HSDP uses data parallel replicas as units of fault tolerance. When failures occur, only a single data-parallel replica containing the failed GPU or server is taken offline and restarted, while the other replicas continue training. To realize this idea at scale, FT-HSDP incorporates several techniques: 1) We introduce a Fault Tolerant All Reduce (FTAR) protocol for gradient exchange across data parallel replicas. FTAR relies on the CPU to drive the complex control logic for tasks like adding or removing participants dynamically, and relies on GPU to perform data transfer for best performance. 2) We introduce a non-blocking catch-up protocol, allowing a recovering replica to join training with minimal stall. Compared with fully synchronous training at O(100K) GPUs, FT-HSDP can reduce the stall time due to failure recovery from 10 minutes to 3 minutes, increasing effective training time from 44% to 80%. We further demonstrate that FT-HSDP's asynchronous recovery does not bring any meaning degradation to the accuracy of the result model.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.

Builds on

20 of 54 references.

References · 20

  1. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  2. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
  3. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
  4. 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
  5. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  6. 2023PyTorch FSDP: Experiences on Scaling Fully Sharded Data Parallelcited by 641
  7. 2024FlashAttention-3: Fast and Accurate Attention with Asynchrony and Low-precisioncited by 507
  8. 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 313
  9. 2018Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlowcited by 275
  10. 2024MegaScale: Scaling Large Language Model Training to More Than 10,000 GPUscited by 111
  11. 2022Bamboo: Making Preemptible Instances Resilient for Affordable Training of Large DNNscited by 49
  12. 2023Oobleck: Resilient Distributed Training of Large Models Using Pipeline Templatescited by 40
8 more
  1. 2017AdaBatch: Adaptive Batch Sizes for Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 29
  2. 2023Unicron: Economizing Self-Healing LLM Training at Scalecited by 16
  3. 2024ReCycle: Resilient Training of Large DNNs using Pipeline Adaptationcited by 14
  4. 2025Robust LLM Training Infrastructure at ByteDancecited by 14
  5. 2024Pipeline Parallelism with Controllable Memorycited by 11
  6. 2024Minder: Faulty Machine Detection for Large-scale Distributed Model Trainingcited by 11
  7. 2022Singularity: Planet-Scale, Preemptive and Elastic Scheduling of AI Workloadscited by 9
  8. 2019Dynamic Mini-batch SGD for Elastic Distributed Training: Learning in the Limbo of Resourcescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.