Learning Robust Reasoning through Guided Adversarial Self-Play
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) produces strong reasoning models, yet they can fail catastrophically when the conditioning context is fallible (e.g., corrupted chain-of-thought, misleading partial solutions, or mild input perturbations), since standard RLVR optimizes final-answer correctness only under clean conditioning. We introduce GASP (Guided Adversarial Self-Play), a robustification method that explicitly trains detect-and-repair capabilities using only outcome verification. Without human labels or external teachers, GASP forms an adversarial self-play game within a single model: a polluter learns to induce failure via locally coherent corruptions, while an agent learns to diagnose and recover under the same corrupted conditioning. To address the scarcity of successful recoveries early in training, we propose in-distribution repair guidance, an imitation term on self-generated repairs that increases recovery probability while preserving previously acquired capabilities. Across four open-weight models (1.5B--8B), GASP transforms strong-but-brittle reasoners into robust ones that withstand misleading and perturbed context while often improving clean accuracy. Further analysis shows that adversarial corruptions induce an effective curriculum, and in-distribution guidance enables rapid recovery learning with minimal representational drift.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.
Builds on
20 of 32 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025The Path Not Taken: RLVR Provably Learns Off the Principals11 Nov
- 2025Geometric-Mean Policy Optimization28 Jul
- 2025ExPO: Unlocking Hard Reasoning with Self-Explanation-Guided Reinforcement Learning3 Jul
- 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers23 Jun
Other references · 16
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 910
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
- 2024Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Modelscited by 552
- 2024Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learningcited by 405
- 2025Does Math Reasoning Improve General LLM Capabilities? Understanding Transferability of LLM Reasoningcited by 101
- 2024Self-playing Adversarial Language Game Enhances LLM Reasoningcited by 80
- 2023MR-GSM8K: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Model Evaluationcited by 57
4 more
- 2025Understanding Aha Moments: from External Observations to Internal Mechanismscited by 48
- 2025Can LLMs Correct Themselves? A Benchmark of Self-Correction in LLMscited by 12
- 2026Triplets Better Than Pairs: Towards Stable and Effective Self-Play Fine-Tuning for LLMscited by 9
- 2025Off-Trajectory Reasoning: Can LLMs Collaborate on Reasoning Trajectory?cited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 8.
8 papers.
- 2026Training-Free Looped Transformerscited by 12
- 2026Self-Refining Vision Language Model for Robotic Failure Detection and Reasoningcited by 6
- 2026PhGPO: Pheromone-Guided Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon Tool Planningcited by 6
- 2026φ-Balancing for Mixture-of-Experts Trainingcited by 4
- 2026Momentum Guidance: Plug-and-Play Guidance for Flow Modelscited by 2
- 2026AgentSpec: Understanding Embodied Agent Scaffolds Through Controlled Compositioncited by 1
- 2026Filtered Reasoning Score: Evaluating Reasoning Quality on a Model's Most-Confident Tracescited by 0
- 2026Balancing Reference Guidance and Free Generation in Trajectory Rollouts for Reasoning RLcited by 0
- 2026Balancing Reference Guidance and Free Generation in Trajectory Rollouts for Reasoning RL8 Oct 2026
- 2026AgentSpec: Understanding Embodied Agent Scaffolds Through Controlled Composition12 Jun 2026
- 2026Training-Free Looped Transformers22 May 2026
- 2026φ-Balancing for Mixture-of-Experts Training14 May 2026
- 2026Filtered Reasoning Score: Evaluating Reasoning Quality on a Model's Most-Confident Traces13 Apr 2026
- 2026Momentum Guidance: Plug-and-Play Guidance for Flow Models23 Feb 2026
- 2026PhGPO: Pheromone-Guided Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon Tool Planning14 Feb 2026
- 2026Self-Refining Vision Language Model for Robotic Failure Detection and Reasoning12 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Seirenes: Adversarial Self-Play with Evolving Distractions for LLM Reasoning
- 2026Self-ReSET: Learning to Self-Recover from Unsafe Reasoning Trajectories
- 2026Training Reasoning Models on Saturated Problems via Failure-Prefix Conditioning
- 2025SPC: Evolving Self-Play Critic via Adversarial Games for LLM Reasoning
- 2026ALIVE: Awakening LLM Reasoning via Adversarial Learning and Instructive Verbal Evaluation
- 2025Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero Data
- 2026From RLVR to RLSVR: Task Transformation Induces Self-Verifiable Rewards for Open-Ended LLM Self-Improvement
- 2025AdvChain: Adversarial Chain-of-Thought Tuning for Robust Safety Alignment of Large Reasoning Models