Gauss-Newton Natural Gradient Descent for Shape Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We explore the use of the Gauss-Newton method for optimization in shape learning, including implicit neural surfaces and geometry-informed neural networks. The method addresses key challenges in shape learning, such as the ill-conditioning of the underlying differential constraints and the mismatch between the optimization problem in parameter space and the function space where the problem is naturally posed. This leads to significantly faster and more stable convergence than standard first-order methods, while also requiring far fewer iterations. Experiments across benchmark shape optimization tasks demonstrate that the Gauss-Newton method consistently improves both training speed and final solution accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2026.
Builds on
21 of 32 references.
References · 21
- 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
- 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
- 2020Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning Shapescited by 707
- 2019SAL: Sign Agnostic Learning of Shapes from Raw Datacited by 389
- 2023WIRE: Wavelet Implicit Neural Representationscited by 220
- 2021Finite Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks (FBPINNs): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equationscited by 142
- 2019A Topological Loss Function for Deep-Learning based Image Segmentation using Persistent Homologycited by 134
- 2020Understanding and mitigating gradient pathologies in physics-informed neural networkscited by 134
- 2020SALD: Sign Agnostic Learning with Derivativescited by 115
- 2024Where Do We Stand with Implicit Neural Representations? A Technical and Performance Surveycited by 41
- 2024Numerical analysis of physics-informed neural networks and related models in physics-informed machine learningcited by 39
9 more
- 2023An operator preconditioning perspective on training in physics-informed machine learningcited by 27
- 2024Gauss-Newton Natural Gradient Descent for Physics-Informed Computational Fluid Dynamicscited by 27
- 2023StEik: Stabilizing the Optimization of Neural Signed Distance Functions and Finer Shape Representationcited by 22
- 2024Kronecker-Factored Approximate Curvature for Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2024Position: Optimization in SciML Should Employ the Function Space Geometrycited by 20
- 2025Improving Energy Natural Gradient Descent through Woodbury, Momentum, and Randomizationcited by 13
- 2024Geometry-Informed Neural Networkscited by 12
- 2023Achieving High Accuracy with PINNs via Energy Natural Gradientscited by 10
- 2024Neural topology optimization: the good, the bad, and the uglycited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.