mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Search with Hierarchical Meta-Cognitive Monitoring Inspired by Cognitive Neuroscience

arXiv 2601.23188 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2026cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep search agents powered by large language models have demonstrated strong capabilities in multi-step retrieval, reasoning, and long-horizon task execution. However, their practical failures often stem from the lack of mechanisms to monitor and regulate reasoning and retrieval states as tasks evolve under uncertainty. Insights from cognitive neuroscience suggest that human metacognition is hierarchically organized, integrating fast anomaly detection with selectively triggered, experience-driven reflection. In this work, we propose Deep Search with Meta-Cognitive Monitoring (DS-MCM), a deep search framework augmented with an explicit hierarchical metacognitive monitoring mechanism. DS-MCM integrates a Fast Consistency Monitor, which performs lightweight checks on the alignment between external evidence and internal reasoning confidence, and a Slow Experience-Driven Monitor, which is selectively activated to guide corrective intervention based on experience memory from historical agent trajectories. By embedding monitoring directly into the reasoning-retrieval loop, DS-MCM determines both when intervention is warranted and how corrective actions should be informed by prior experience. Experiments across multiple deep search benchmarks and backbone models demonstrate that DS-MCM consistently improves performance and robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.

Builds on

19 of 44 references.

References · 19

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
  4. 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,107
  5. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  6. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
  7. 2025BrowseComp: A Simple Yet Challenging Benchmark for Browsing Agentscited by 616
  8. 2025WebThinker: Empowering Large Reasoning Models with Deep Research Capabilitycited by 320
  9. 2024ProcessBench: Identifying Process Errors in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 277
  10. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modelingcited by 233
  11. 2024Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Taskscited by 221
  12. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Modelscited by 193
7 more
  1. 2025BrowseComp-Plus: A More Fair and Transparent Evaluation Benchmark of Deep-Research Agentcited by 183
  2. 2025BrowseComp-ZH: Benchmarking Web Browsing Ability of Large Language Models in Chinesecited by 139
  3. 2025xbench: Tracking Agents Productivity Scaling with Profession-Aligned Real-World Evaluationscited by 118
  4. 2024Self-Generated Critiques Boost Reward Modeling for Language Modelscited by 69
  5. 2025ReARTeR: Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning with Trustworthy Process Rewardingcited by 32
  6. 2025Detection and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Reasoning Models: A Mechanistic Perspectivecited by 32
  7. 2025Pushing Test-Time Scaling Limits of Deep Search with Asymmetric Verificationcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.