Securing Time Integrity in Energy IoT Against Clock Drift and Y2K38 Failures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Time integrity across distributed Internet of Things (IoT) devices is fundamental to reliable sensing, control, and security in energy cyber-physical systems. However, operational energy IoT systems remain vulnerable to clock-drift escalation, time-synchronization manipulation, and catastrophic timestamp discontinuities, e.g., the Year 2038 (Y2K38) Unix epoch overflow. These failures violate timestamp monotonicity, distort temporal ordering, and introduce structured inconsistencies in system observations. Conventional anomaly detection models, which typically assume reliable and uniformly ordered timestamps, are therefore ill-equipped to capture timing-layer failures. This paper introduces STGAT (Spatio-Temporal Graph Attention Network), a clock-dynamics-aware anomaly detection solution that jointly models temporal distortion and inter-device consistency in energy IoT systems. STGAT integrates drift-aware temporal embeddings and temporal self-attention to capture non-uniform and corrupted time evolution within individual device streams, while graph attention models the spatial propagation of timing inconsistencies across interconnected nodes. A Jacobian-regularized latent representation further promotes geometric separation between nominal clock evolution and anomalous temporal deformation caused by drift escalation, synchronization offsets, jitter accumulation, and epoch-overflow events. Experimental evaluation on energy IoT telemetry augmented with controlled timing-layer perturbations shows that STGAT achieves 95.7% accuracy, 94.0% precision, 92.0% recall, 93.0% F1-score, and 0.97 AUC under the primary test setting. STGAT also reduces detection delay to 2.3 time steps, corresponding to a 26% improvement over the closest baseline, while maintaining stable performance under overflow-induced discontinuities, stealthy drift escalation, and temporally induced physical inconsistencies.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.
Builds on
16 of 67 references.
References · 16
- 2021Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancycited by 394
- 2020Multivariate Time-series Anomaly Detection via Graph Attention Networkcited by 167
- 2023A Survey on Graph Neural Networks for Time Series: Forecasting, Classification, Imputation, and Anomaly Detectioncited by 145
- 2021Learning Graph Structures with Transformer for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection in IoTcited by 104
- 2025Rethinking Irregular Time Series Forecasting: A Simple yet Effective Baselinecited by 55
- 2023MST-GAT: A Multimodal Spatial-Temporal Graph Attention Network for Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 20
- 2025Positional Encoding in Transformer-Based Time Series Models: A Surveycited by 14
- 2024Graph Spatiotemporal Process for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection with Missing Valuescited by 10
- 2022Improving Interpretability via Regularization of Neural Activation Sensitivitycited by 5
- 2021Multi-Source Data Fusion for Cyberattack Detection in Power Systemscited by 4
- 2022The Syncline Model -- Analyzing the Impact of Time Synchronization in Sensor Fusioncited by 3
- 2023Improving Robustness Against Adversarial Attacks with Deeply Quantized Neural Networkscited by 3
4 more
- 2025Think Fast: Real-Time IoT Intrusion Reasoning Using IDS and LLMs at the Edge Gatewaycited by 3
- 2024Tracking Real-time Anomalies in Cyber-Physical Systems Through Dynamic Behavioral Analysiscited by 2
- 2025SoK: Timeline based event reconstruction for digital forensics: Terminology, methodology, and current challengescited by 2
- 2025Time-based GNSS attack detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.