mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Matterhorn: Masked Time-to-First-Spike Encoding by Reassigning the Silent State for Sparse and Energy-Efficient Spiking Transformers

arXiv 2601.22876 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Spiking neural networks (SNNs) promise energy-efficient inference for large language models (LLMs), yet most reported savings rely on compute-operation counts that overlook data movement. Energy characterization of representative spiking transformers on a commercial 22-nm process shows that accumulation contributes less than 3% of total energy, while spike-triggered inter-core transfers and weight reads dominate the cost. This makes time-to-first-spike (TTFS) encoding a natural choice, as it limits each neuron to at most one spike. However, standard TTFS maps the silent state, an all-zero spike train that transmits no events, to the rarely occurring smallest value, while the most common activations still spike. This raises a simple question: why reserve the only cost-free codeword for a rare value? This choice inverts a basic principle of energy-aware coding, under which the zero-event codeword should represent the most common value, rather than a rare extreme. Thus, we introduce masked time-to-first-spike encoding (M-TTFS), which uses a temporal mask to reassign the silent state to the most common activation value, and a dead-zone extension that trades a controlled amount of information for greater sparsity. Built on M-TTFS with dead-zone radius k=1, our spiking transformer Matterhorn reaches an overall spike rate of 1.64% on GLUE at an average score of 84.64, exceeding the best prior spiking transformer by 1.42 percentage points while consuming 67% less energy, with consistent gains on spiking LLaMA models from 7B to 70B parameters. Together, these results show that under hardware-faithful accounting, the energy advantage of SNNs is not a given: it is earned by encodings that align spikes with the data distribution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.

Builds on

14 of 23 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  3. 2019TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understandingcited by 1,153
  4. 2022BiT: Robustly Binarized Multi-distilled Transformercited by 51
  5. 2023SpikingBERT: Distilling BERT to Train Spiking Language Models Using Implicit Differentiationcited by 47
  6. 2024SpikeLM: Towards General Spike-Driven Language Modeling via Elastic Bi-Spiking Mechanismscited by 31
  7. 2018Neural Cache: Bit-Serial In-Cache Acceleration of Deep Neural Networkscited by 29
  8. 2024SpikeLLM: Scaling up Spiking Neural Network to Large Language Models via Saliency-based Spikingcited by 29
  9. 2024Sorbet: A Neuromorphic Hardware-Compatible Transformer-Based Spiking Language Modelcited by 6
  10. 2022A Time-to-first-spike Coding and Conversion Aware Training for Energy-Efficient Deep Spiking Neural Network Processor Designcited by 5
  11. 2025Otters: An Energy-Efficient SpikingTransformer via Optical Time-to-First-Spike Encodingcited by 5
  12. 2023Sparse-firing regularization methods for spiking neural networks with time-to-first spike codingcited by 3
2 more
  1. 2025Energy-Efficient and Dequantization-Free Q-LLMs: A Spiking Neural Network Approach to Salient Value Mitigationcited by 2
  2. 2025SpikeX: Exploring Accelerator Architecture and Network-Hardware Co-Optimization for Sparse Spiking Neural Networkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.