Clipping-Free Policy Optimization for Large Language Models
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning has become central to post-training large language models, yet dominant algorithms rely on clipping mechanisms that introduce optimization issues at scale, including zero-gradient regions, reward hacking, and training instability. We propose Clipping-Free Policy Optimization (CFPO), which replaces heuristic clipping with a convex quadratic penalty derived from Total Variation divergence constraints, yielding an everywhere-differentiable objective that enforces stable policy updates without hard boundaries. We evaluate CFPO across both reasoning and alignment settings. In reasoning, CFPO matches clipping-based methods on downstream benchmarks while extending the stable training regime. In alignment, CFPO mitigates verbosity exploitation and reduces capability degradation, while achieving competitive instruction-following performance. CFPO requires only a one-line code change and no additional hyperparameters. Our results suggest that CFPO is a promising drop-in alternative to clipping-based methods for LLM post-training.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 36 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2026.
Builds on
36 of 52 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 35
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
23 more
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,678
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,056
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
- 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 318
- 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 184
- 2023ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 184
- 2021Policy Mirror Descent for Reinforcement Learning: Linear Convergence, New Sampling Complexity, and Generalized Problem Classescited by 149
- 2020Mirror Descent Policy Optimizationcited by 102
- 2019Truly Proximal Policy Optimizationcited by 68
- 2021Generalized Proximal Policy Optimization with Sample Reusecited by 39
- 2025Low-probability Tokens Sustain Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardcited by 25
- 2017f-Divergence constrained policy improvementcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Turning Off-Policy Tokens On-Policy: A Plug-in Approach for Improving LLM Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026Deconstructing Off-Policy Ratios: Entropy-Normalized Trust Regions for Asynchronous Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026BRACE: Anchored Bellman-Residual Correction for Stale Critics in Asynchronous RLcited by 0
- 2026BRACE: Anchored Bellman-Residual Correction for Stale Critics in Asynchronous RL9 Sep 2026
- 2026Deconstructing Off-Policy Ratios: Entropy-Normalized Trust Regions for Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning24 Jul 2026
- 2026Turning Off-Policy Tokens On-Policy: A Plug-in Approach for Improving LLM Alignment6 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025BAPO: Stabilizing Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning for LLMs via Balanced Policy Optimization with Adaptive Clipping
- 2026Ratio-Variance Regularized Policy Optimization for Efficient LLM Fine-tuning
- 2026Rethinking the Trust Region in LLM Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Towards Better Training Signal: Advantage Clipped Policy Optimization
- 2026From log π to π: Taming Divergence in Soft Clipping via Bilateral Decoupled Decay of Probability Gradient Weight
- 2025M-GRPO: Stabilizing Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Models with Momentum-Anchored Policy Optimization
- 2025CPGD: Toward Stable Rule-based Reinforcement Learning for Language Models
- 2026Buffer Matters: Unleashing the Power of Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning in Large Language Model Reasoning