mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quantifying the Uncertainty of Foundation Models with Singular Value Ensembles

arXiv 2601.22068 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2026cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Foundation models have become a dominant paradigm in machine learning, achieving remarkable performance across diverse tasks through large-scale pretraining. However, they often yield overconfident, uncalibrated predictions. The standard approach to quantifying epistemic uncertainty are ensembles of multiple independently trained models. But their computational cost scales linearly with ensemble size, making them impractical for large foundation models. We propose Singular Value Ensemble (SVE), a parameter-efficient implicit ensembling method. SVE builds on a simple, but powerful core assumption: namely, that the singular vectors of the weight matrices correspond to meaningful directions in the representation space. If the singular vectors are indeed meaningful (orthogonal) "knowledge directions", then a model ensemble can be obtained by modulating only how strongly each direction contributes to the output. Rather than learning new parameters for each ensemble member, we freeze the singular vectors and only train per-member singular values that rescale the contribution of each direction in that shared knowledge basis. Ensemble diversity emerges naturally during joint training as stochastic initialization and random batch sampling cause different members to converge to different combinations of the same underlying knowledge. SVE performs comparable to an explicit ensemble, while increasing the parameter count of the base model by <1%, making principled uncertainty estimation accessible in resource-constrained settings. We validate SVE on NLP and vision tasks with various different backbones and show that it improves calibration while maintaining predictive accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.

Builds on

41 of 62 references.

References · 41

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  5. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  6. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  7. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  8. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  9. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  10. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  11. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  12. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
29 more
  1. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  2. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  3. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  5. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  6. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  7. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  8. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  9. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  10. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
  11. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
  12. 2019Deep Ensembles: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 443
  13. 2020Simple and Principled Uncertainty Estimation with Deterministic Deep Learning via Distance Awarenesscited by 389
  14. 2020BatchEnsemble: An Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong Learningcited by 371
  15. 2014Stochastic Gradient Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 343
  16. 2013Black Box Variational Inferencecited by 319
  17. 2019Evaluating Scalable Bayesian Deep Learning Methods for Robust Computer Visioncited by 182
  18. 2020Training independent subnetworks for robust predictioncited by 177
  19. 2023Bayesian Low-rank Adaptation for Large Language Modelscited by 115
  20. 2023LoRA ensembles for large language model fine-tuningcited by 67
  21. 2024SVFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning with Singular Vectorscited by 58
  22. 2022Singular Value Fine-tuning: Few-shot Segmentation requires Few-parameters Fine-tuningcited by 50
  23. 2024BLoB: Bayesian Low-Rank Adaptation by Backpropagation for Large Language Modelscited by 50
  24. 2022Exploring Predictive Uncertainty and Calibration in NLP: A Study on the Impact of Method & Data Scarcitycited by 25
  25. 2022FiLM-Ensemble: Probabilistic Deep Learning via Feature-wise Linear Modulationcited by 24
  26. 2024Small Singular Values Matter: A Random Matrix Analysis of Transformer Modelscited by 21
  27. 2024LoRA-Ensemble: Efficient Uncertainty Modelling for Self-Attention Networkscited by 20
  28. 2024SVFit: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Pre-Trained Models Using Singular Valuescited by 11
  29. 2023Split-Ensemble: Efficient OOD-aware Ensemble via Task and Model Splittingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.