mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Path of Least Resistance: Guiding LLM Reasoning Trajectories with Prefix Consensus

arXiv 2601.21494 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models achieve strong reasoning performance, but inference strategies such as Self-Consistency (SC) are computationally expensive, as they fully expand all reasoning traces. We introduce PoLR (Path of Least Resistance), the first inference-time method to leverage prefix consistency for compute-efficient reasoning. PoLR clusters short prefixes of reasoning traces, identifies the dominant cluster, and expands all paths in that cluster, preserving the accuracy benefits of SC while substantially reducing token usage and latency. Our theoretical analysis, framed via mutual information and entropy, explains why early reasoning steps encode strong signals predictive of final correctness. Empirically, PoLR consistently matches or exceeds SC across GSM8K, MATH500, AIME24/25, and GPQA-DIAMOND, reducing token usage by up to 60% and wall-clock latency by up to 50%. Moreover, PoLR is fully complementary to adaptive inference methods (e.g., Adaptive Consistency, Early-Stopping SC) and can serve as a drop-in pre-filter, making SC substantially more efficient and scalable without requiring model fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.

Builds on

14 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning Models4 Mar
  2. 2024Path-Consistency with Prefix Enhancement for Efficient Inference in LLMs25 Aug

Other references · 12

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  6. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  7. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  8. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
  9. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
  10. 2023Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 427
  11. 2025Phi-4-reasoning Technical Reportcited by 151
  12. 2025MiMo: Unlocking the Reasoning Potential of Language Model -- From Pretraining to Posttrainingcited by 121

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025The Sequential Edge: Inverse-Entropy Voting Beats Parallel Self-Consistency at Matched Compute
  2. 2026Divergent-Convergent Reasoning: Scaling Test-Time Compute through Structured Solution Synthesis
  3. 2026A Single Revision Step Improves Token-Efficient LLM Reasoning
  4. 2025Reasoning on a Budget: A Survey of Adaptive and Controllable Test-Time Compute in LLMs
  5. 2026ThinkBooster: A Unified Framework for Seamless Test-Time Scaling of LLM Reasoning
  6. 2024Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling
  7. 2025Double-Checker: Enhancing Reasoning of Slow-Thinking LLMs via Self-Critical Fine-Tuning
  8. 2024Lachesis: Predicting LLM Inference Accuracy using Structural Properties of Reasoning Paths