Lachesis: Predicting LLM Inference Accuracy using Structural Properties of Reasoning Paths
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models are increasingly used to build agents to perform more complex tasks. As LLMs perform more complicated reasoning through longer interactions, self-consistency, i.e., the idea that the answer obtained from sampling and marginalising a number of multiple independent inferences is more likely to be correct, has received much attention as a simple validation technique. This paper aims to empirically verify this intuitive hypothesis by predicting the correctness of answers obtained using self-consistency from properties of the samples of reasoning paths. We introduce Lachesis, a predictive model for self-consistency based LLM inferences, and empirically evaluate it using AutoFL, a recently proposed LLM-based fault localisation technique, as the target technique that uses self-consistency. Lachesis converts collected reasoning paths from AutoFL using specifically designed reasoning path representations, and trains LSTM and GCN models to predict whether a given set of reasoning paths would result in a correct answer. The results suggest that Lachesis can predict the correctness of answers with a precision of up to 0.8136, highlighting the possibility of training a predictive model that can allow early termination of inferences that are not likely to be successful.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 3 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2024.
Builds on
3 of 16 references.
References · 3
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
6 papers.
- 2025Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 381
- 2025Auditing Meta-Cognitive Hallucinations in Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2026Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswapcited by 3
- 2025Capturing Semantic Flow of ML-based Systemscited by 1
- 2026Beyond Accuracy: Characterizing Code Comprehension Capabilities in (Large) Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agentscited by 0
- 2026What Can Component-Replacement Evidence Establish? A Critical Scoping Review of Local Decisions in LLM Agents30 Sep 2026
- 2026Atropos: Improving Cost-Benefit Trade-off of LLM-based Agents under Self-Consistency with Early Termination and Model Hotswap16 Apr 2026
- 2026Beyond Accuracy: Characterizing Code Comprehension Capabilities in (Large) Language Models19 Jan 2026
- 2025Auditing Meta-Cognitive Hallucinations in Reasoning Large Language Models19 May 2025
- 2025Capturing Semantic Flow of ML-based Systems13 Mar 2025
- 2025Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models12 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Two Failures of Self-Consistency in the Multi-Step Reasoning of LLMs
- 2024Reasoning Aware Self-Consistency: Leveraging Reasoning Paths for Efficient LLM Sampling
- 2025A Theoretical Study on Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for LLM Reasoning
- 2025Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for Effective and Efficient LLM Reasoning
- 2025Self-Consistency Is Losing Its Edge: Diminishing Returns and Rising Costs in Modern LLMs
- 2025Dancing with Critiques: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Stepwise Natural Language Self-Critique
- 2025Confidence Improves Self-Consistency in LLMs
- 2024Path-Consistency with Prefix Enhancement for Efficient Inference in LLMs