Thinking Seeds: Leveraging Historical Diversity for Position-Aware RL in LLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
On-policy reinforcement learning (RL) for language model post-training suffers from a fundamental tension: as training progresses, policy entropy collapses and sampling diversity diminishes, causing the model to ``forget'' its own earlier exploratory capacity. While off-policy data can restore diversity, existing methods mix entire trajectories at the sequence level, introducing severe policy mismatch and training instability. We argue that the core question is not whether to use off-policy data, but where in the sequence it should appear. Based on this insight, we propose Thinking Seeds, a token-level mix-policy framework that uses the model's own historical checkpoints as off-policy prefixes, providing diverse starting points for reasoning, while the critical continuation is generated on-policy to preserve gradient quality. Through token-level importance ratios, Thinking Seeds effectively leverages historical diversity without compromising training stability. Extensive experiments across models and mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that Thinking Seeds consistently outperforms standard on-policy training and existing off-policy extensions. Our analysis reveals that the method maintains higher effective entropy, reduces gradient loss from clipping, and expands the explorable solution space, clarifying how position-aware mix-policy modeling improves both exploration and final performance in LLM RL.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 35 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.
Builds on
35 of 49 references.
Closest ancestors · 25
Same direction, newest first
- 2025ADHint: Adaptive Hints with Difficulty Priors for Reinforcement Learning15 Dec
- 2025Prosperity before Collapse: How Far Can Off-Policy RL Reach with Stale Data on LLMs?1 Oct
- 2025SPEC-RL: Accelerating On-Policy Reinforcement Learning with Speculative Rollouts27 Sep
- 2025Staying in the Sweet Spot: Responsive Reasoning Evolution via Capability-Adaptive Hint Scaffolding8 Sep
- 2025History Rhymes: Accelerating LLM Reinforcement Learning with RhymeRL26 Aug
- 2025CURE: Critical-Token-Guided Re-Concatenation for Entropy-Collapse Prevention14 Aug
- 2025From Data-Centric to Sample-Centric: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Progressive Optimization9 Jul
- 2025StepHint: Multi-level Stepwise Hints Enhance Reinforcement Learning to Reason3 Jul
- 2025Blending Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning with Prefix Sampling2 Jul
- 2025Prefix Grouper: Efficient GRPO Training through Shared-Prefix Forward5 Jun
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning2 Jun
- 2025The Surprising Effectiveness of Negative Reinforcement in LLM Reasoning2 Jun
13 more
- 2025AReaL: A Large-Scale Asynchronous Reinforcement Learning System for Language Reasoning30 May
- 2025On-Policy RL with Optimal Reward Baseline29 May
- 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models28 May
- 2025Revisiting Group Relative Policy Optimization: Insights into On-Policy and Off-Policy Training28 May
- 2025Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance21 Apr
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?18 Apr
- 2025Echo Chamber: RL Post-training Amplifies Behaviors Learned in Pretraining10 Apr
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective26 Mar
- 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
- 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs3 Mar
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning22 Jan
- 2025REINFORCE++: Stabilizing Critic-Free Policy Optimization with Global Advantage Normalization4 Jan
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training22 Nov
Other references · 10
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2025Skywork Open Reasoner 1 Technical Reportcited by 161
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
- 2024Understanding the performance gap between online and offline alignment algorithmscited by 110
- 2025On-Policy RL Meets Off-Policy Experts: Harmonizing Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning via Dynamic Weightingcited by 88
- 2025StreamRL: Scalable, Heterogeneous, and Elastic RL for LLMs with Disaggregated Stream Generationcited by 56
- 2025Demystifying Reasoning Dynamics with Mutual Information: Thinking Tokens are Information Peaks in LLM Reasoningcited by 50
- 2025Bridging Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning for LLMscited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026LLMs Can Learn to Reason Via Off-Policy RL
- 2025Squeeze the Soaked Sponge: Efficient Off-policy Reinforcement Finetuning for Large Language Model
- 2026ARMOR: Stabilizing On-Policy LLM RL with Off-Policy Anchor Samples
- 2025Diversity-Aware Policy Optimization for Large Language Model Reasoning
- 2026Large Language Model Post-Training: A Unified View of Off-Policy and On-Policy Learning
- 2026RePO: Bridging On-Policy Learning and Off-Policy Knowledge through Rephrasing Policy Optimization
- 2026Breaking the Capability Ceiling of LLM Post-Training by Reintroducing Markov States
- 2026Rethinking RL for LLM Reasoning: It's Sparse Policy Selection, Not Capability Learning