mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Planner-Auditor Twin: Agentic Discharge Planning with FHIR-Based LLM Planning, Guideline Recall, Optional Caching and Self-Improvement

arXiv 2601.21113 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2026cs.AI cs.MAcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Objective: Large language models (LLMs) show promise for clinical discharge planning, but their use is constrained by hallucination, omissions, and miscalibrated confidence. We introduce a self-improving, cache-optional Planner-Auditor framework that improves safety and reliability by decoupling generation from deterministic validation and targeted replay. Materials and Methods: We implemented an agentic, retrospective, FHIR-native evaluation pipeline using MIMIC-IV-on-FHIR. For each patient, the Planner (LLM) generates a structured discharge action plan with an explicit confidence estimate. The Auditor is a deterministic module that evaluates multi-task coverage, tracks calibration (Brier score, ECE proxies), and monitors action-distribution drift. The framework supports two-tier self-improvement: (i) within-episode regeneration when enabled, and (ii) cross-episode discrepancy buffering with replay for high-confidence, low-coverage cases. Results: While context caching improved performance over baseline, the self-improvement loop was the primary driver of gains, increasing task coverage from 32% to 86%. Calibration improved substantially, with reduced Brier/ECE and fewer high-confidence misses. Discrepancy buffering further corrected persistent high-confidence omissions during replay. Discussion: Feedback-driven regeneration and targeted replay act as effective control mechanisms to reduce omissions and improve confidence reliability in structured clinical planning. Separating an LLM Planner from a rule-based, observational Auditor enables systematic reliability measurement and safer iteration without model retraining. Conclusion: The Planner-Auditor framework offers a practical pathway toward safer automated discharge planning using interoperable FHIR data access and deterministic auditing, supported by reproducible ablations and reliability-focused evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.

Builds on

3 of 36 references.

References · 3

  1. 2023Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarizationcited by 244
  2. 2025Large Language Models Hallucination: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 45
  3. 2024Towards Reliable Medical Question Answering: Techniques and Challenges in Mitigating Hallucinations in Language Modelscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Detecting Clinical Discrepancies in Health Coaching Agents: A Dual-Stream Memory and Reconciliation Architecture
  2. 2025DischargeSim: A Simulation Benchmark for Educational Doctor-Patient Communication at Discharge
  3. 2026Bridging the Post-discharge Gap: A Traceable Multi-agent Framework for Safe and Continuous Care ↗
  4. 2026Asclepius: An Adaptive Harness for Long-Horizon Clinical Agents
  5. 2026CodeClinic: Evaluating Automation of Coding Skills for Clinical Reasoning Agents
  6. 2024IgnitionInnovators at "Discharge Me!": Chain-of-Thought Instruction Finetuning Large Language Models for Discharge Summaries
  7. 2025TIMER: Temporal Instruction Modeling and Evaluation for Longitudinal Clinical Records
  8. 2024Agentic LLM Workflows for Generating Patient-Friendly Medical Reports