mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Fault-Adaptive Routing in Eisenstein-Jacobi Interconnection Topologies

arXiv 2601.21090 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2026cs.DC cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL for energy, networks and operations

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing density of many-core architectures necessitates interconnection networks that are both high-performance and fault-resilient. Eisenstein-Jacobi (EJ) networks, with their symmetric 6-regular topology, offer superior topological properties but challenge traditional routing heuristics under fault conditions. This paper evaluates three routing paradigms in faulty EJ environments: deterministic Greedy Adaptive Routing, theoretically optimal Dijkstra's algorithm, and a reinforcement learning (RL)-based approach. Using a multi-objective reward function to penalize fault proximity and reward path efficiency, the RL agent learns to navigate around clustered failures that typically induce dead-ends in greedy geometric routing. Dijkstra's algorithm establishes the theoretical performance ceiling by computing globally optimal paths with complete topology knowledge, revealing the true connectivity limits of faulty networks. Quantitative analysis at nine faulty nodes shows greedy routing catastrophically degrades to 10% effective reachability and packet delivery, while Dijkstra proves 52-54% represents the topological optimum. The RL agent achieves 94% effective reachability and 91% packet delivery, making it suitable for distributed deployment. Furthermore, throughput evaluations demonstrate that RL sustains over 90% normalized throughput across all loads, actually outperforming Dijkstra under congestion through implicit load balancing strategies. These results establish RL-based adaptive policies as a practical solution that bridges the gap between greedy's efficiency and Dijkstra's optimality, providing robust, self-healing communication in fault-prone interconnection networks without requiring the global topology knowledge or computational overhead of optimal algorithms.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL for energy, networks and operations, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 4 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.

Builds on

4 of 36 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  2. 2016An Improved One-to-All Broadcasting in Higher Dimensional Eisenstein-Jacobi Networkscited by 1
  3. 2025Toward Self-Healing Networks-on-Chip: RL-Driven Routing in 2D Torus Architecturescited by 1
  4. 2025Resilient Packet Forwarding: A Reinforcement Learning Approach to Routing in Gaussian Interconnected Networks with Clustered Faultscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Validity-Preserving Hierarchical RL for Joint Routing and Switch Placement in EDA
  2. 2024A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Adaptive Traffic Routing in Next-gen Networks
  3. 2025Adaptive routing protocols for determining optimal paths in AI multi-agent systems: a priority- and learning-enhanced approach
  4. 2025A Multi-Agent, Policy-Gradient approach to Network Routing
  5. 2025A Flexible Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for Dynamic Routing and Scheduling of Latency-Critical Services
  6. 2026Routing Dense Layouts with History-Aware Offline Reinforcement Learning using LSTM
  7. 2025Spatial-Temporal Reinforcement Learning for Network Routing with Non-Markovian Traffic
  8. 2025A New Segment Routing method with Swap Node Selection Strategy Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Software Defined Network