Bridging the Applicator Gap with Data-Doping:Dual-Domain Learning for Precise Bladder Segmentation in CT-Guided Brachytherapy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Performance degradation due to covariate shift remains a major challenge for deep learning models in medical image segmentation. An open question is whether samples from a shifted distribution can effectively support learning when combined with limited target domain data. We investigate this problem in the context of bladder segmentation in CT guided gynecological brachytherapy, a critical task for accurate dose optimization and organ at risk sparing. While CT scans without brachytherapy applicators (no applicator: NA) are widely available, scans with applicators inserted (with applicator: WA) are scarce and exhibit substantial anatomical deformation and imaging artifacts, making automated segmentation particularly difficult. We propose a dual domain learning strategy that integrates NA and WA CT data to improve robustness and generalizability under covariate shift. Using a curated assorted dataset, we show that NA data alone fail to capture the anatomical and artifact related characteristics of WA images. However, introducing a modest proportion of WA data into a predominantly NA training set leads to significant performance improvements. Through systematic experiments across axial, coronal, and sagittal planes using multiple deep learning architectures, we demonstrate that doping only 10 to 30 percent WA data achieves segmentation performance comparable to models trained exclusively on WA data. The proposed approach attains Dice similarity coefficients of up to 0.94 and Intersection over Union scores of up to 0.92, indicating effective domain adaptation and improved clinical reliability. This study highlights the value of integrating anatomically similar but distribution shifted datasets to overcome data scarcity and enhance deep learning based segmentation for brachytherapy treatment planning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.
Builds on
11 of 45 references.
References · 11
- 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,518
- 2018Attention U-Net: Learning Where to Look for the Pancreascited by 1,420
- 2018ESRGAN: Enhanced Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,250
- 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 620
- 2022AMOS: A Large-Scale Abdominal Multi-Organ Benchmark for Versatile Medical Image Segmentationcited by 347
- 2016Unsupervised domain adaptation in brain lesion segmentation with adversarial networkscited by 125
- 2018Modeling Visual Context is Key to Augmenting Object Detection Datasetscited by 106
- 2023The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Glioma Segmentation in Sub-Saharan Africa Patient Population (BraTS-Africa)cited by 51
- 2018Learning Data Augmentation for Brain Tumor Segmentation with Coarse-to-Fine Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 15
- 2023Exploring 3D U-Net Training Configurations and Post-Processing Strategies for the MICCAI 2023 Kidney and Tumor Segmentation Challengecited by 6
- 2021U-Net-and-a-half: Convolutional network for biomedical image segmentation using multiple expert-driven annotationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.