mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Designing large language model prompts to extract scores from messy text: A shared dataset and challenge

arXiv 2601.18271 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2026cs.DL cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In some areas of computing, natural language processing and information science, progress is made by sharing datasets and challenging the community to design the best algorithm for an associated task. This article introduces a shared dataset of 1446 short texts, each of which describes a research quality score on the UK scale of 1* to 4*. This is a messy collection, with some texts not containing scores and others including invalid scores or strange formats. With this dataset there is also a description of what constitutes a valid score and a "gold standard" of the correct scores for these texts (including missing values). The challenge is to design a prompt for Large Language Models (LLMs) to extract the scores from these texts as accurately as possible. The format for the response should be a number and no other text so there are two aspects to the challenge: ensuring that the LLM returns only a number, and instructing it to deduce the correct number for the text. As part of this, the LLM prompt needs to explain when to return the missing value code, -1, instead of a number when the text does not clearly contain one. The article also provides an example of a simple prompt. The purpose of the challenge is twofold: to get an effective solution to this problem, and to increase understanding of prompt design and LLM capabilities for complex numerical tasks. The initial solution suggested has an accuracy of 72.6%, so the challenge is to beat this.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2026.

Builds on

10 of 16 references.

References · 10

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  4. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
  5. 2024Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluatorscited by 153
  6. 2024LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Textscited by 87
  7. 2024In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 resultscited by 5
  8. 2025LASER: An LLM-based ASR Scoring and Evaluation Rubriccited by 5
  9. 2025Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPTcited by 2
  10. 2025Can Small and Reasoning Large Language Models Score Journal Articles for Research Quality and Do Averaging and Few-shot Help?cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.